Mitt Romney calls half of America freeloaders

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I didn't misuse anything and I'm not going to let you squirm your way out of this. I was showing you that "red" states have some of the highest unemployment rates in the country. So, unless you're a total idiot in complete denial (possible in your case) there are A LOT of people in those states taking advantage of the system. Which negates your whole premise.

How exactly do you know a large majority of freeloaders are voting for Obama? What is the basis for your assumption?

So you are calling people temporarily out of work but who are looking for work freeloaders??? I never called those people freeloaders, again some projecting from you. The real Dahoss is being exposed.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

So you are calling people temporarily out of work but who are looking for work freeloaders??? I never called those people freeloaders, again some projecting from you. The real Dahoss is being exposed.

No...I didn't say that. I said only a complete idiot in denial would think that none of the people currently on unemployment in the states I mentioned are not taking advantage of the system. Which is what you are saying.

Your opinion shows a total lack of awareness for the world outside of your (whatever character you are playing today) bubble.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

No...I didn't say that. I said only a complete idiot in denial would think that none of the people currently on unemployment in the states I mentioned are not taking advantage of the system. Which is what you are saying.

Your opinion shows a total lack of awareness for the world outside of your (whatever character you are playing today) bubble.

I am saying what?????? Please clarify.

by the what, why the name calling, can't you discuss an issue without resorting to name calling?

Address the my question, which you seem to be avoiding, did you purposely misuse the unemployment number or did you not know who it represents?

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I am saying what?????? Please clarify.

by the what, why the name calling, can't you discuss an issue without resorting to name calling?

Address the my question, which you seem to be avoiding, did you purposely misuse the unemployment number or did you not know who it represents?

I already answered your question and pointed out to you why your assumptions were faulty.

You can keep deflecting all you want, but you've got no one fooled and you never have.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I already answered your question and pointed out to you why your assumptions were faulty.

You can keep deflecting all you want, but you've got no one fooled and you never have.

No you never answered my question, you had no idea what the unemployment rate represents.

Also, you are just making stuff up to cover your ass. I never said unemployed people were freeloaders.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I already answered your question and pointed out to you why your assumptions were faulty.

You can keep deflecting all you want, but you've got no one fooled and you never have.

Seems to me that your agenda here has nothing to do with debating politics. You already know PD is not me and I find it hard to believe that you really think I could keep up the charade that you have manufactured here. It also seems to me that you are trying to bait PD on a trivial point because you don't like the views. If you don't like his views on politics, why don't you debate him instead of insulting him?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by pointman

Seems to me that your agenda here has nothing to do with debating politics. You already know PD is not me and I find it hard to believe that you really think I could keep up the charade that you have manufactured here. It also seems to me that you are trying to bait PD on a trivial point. If you don't like his views on politics, why don't you debate him instead of insulting him?

Pointman. You just posted this but don't show up as currently logged on users yet PainD does... Who the fuk are you kidding. As a matter of fact I have Never seen both of you logged in at the same time. Of course there are ways to simulate it and I am sure that is what we will see in the future but why hasn't it happened yet.. Sad Dude cause I thought you were a decent sort.

So we might be talking to Sybil. Big f.ucking deal. The important thing is people who want higher taxes actually give extra.

Do it. Or just give all your money away. Be all you can be. Your shepherd is right. Listen to him and give all you can because your shepherd is above the law.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by jms62

Pointman. You just posted this but don't show up as currently logged on users yet PainD does... Who the fuk are you kidding.

I am kidding no one. The mods know that PD is not me, so let's stop playing games. I am sorry you don't like PD's views but to continue to come after me for merely introducing the website to others is silly.

Please tell me why I would need to do what you accuse me of?

[pmacdaddy]

Originally Posted by jms62

Pointman. You just posted this but don't show up as currently logged on users yet PainD does... Who the fuk are you kidding. As a matter of fact I have Never seen both of you logged in at the same time. Of course there are ways to simulate it and I am sure that is what we will see in the future but why hasn't it happened yet.. Sad Dude cause I thought you were a decent sort.

Wow. They have different user settings. You cracked the case...

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by jms62

Pointman. You just posted this but don't show up as currently logged on users yet PainD does... Who the fuk are you kidding. As a matter of fact I have Never seen both of you logged in at the same time. Of course there are ways to simulate it and I am sure that is what we will see in the future but why hasn't it happened yet.. Sad Dude cause I thought you were a decent sort.

look now conspiracy theorist, in fact since I have been logged on all morning and Pointman just posted then obviously we are both logged on at the same time. What's matter JMS, you thought Point Man was a good guy until you decided that you didn't like his politics? do you think Riot is a good person with all of her nasty insults and bullying?

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by pointman

Seems to me that your agenda here has nothing to do with debating politics. You already know PD is not me and I find it hard to believe that you really think I could keep up the charade that you have manufactured here. It also seems to me that you are trying to bait PD on a trivial point because you don't like the views. If you don't like his views on politics, why don't you debate him instead of insulting him?

I tried debating him (you) and he's disingenuous and would rather deflect than discuss anything other than "Obama sucks."

He said all freeloaders are voting for Obama. Well, obviously that isn't true, but he has said many times he stands by it. When I have tried to ask him how he knows, he ignored it. When I showed him info that would lead to his assumption being untrue, he deflected and then talked around it.

And really...you're the last person that should be talking about an agenda.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I tried debating him (you) and he's disingenuous and would rather deflect than discuss anything other than "Obama sucks."

He said all freeloaders are voting for Obama. Well, obviously that isn't true, but he has said many times he stands by it. When I have tried to ask him how he knows, he ignored it. When I showed him info that would lead to his assumption being untrue, he deflected and then talked around it.

And really...you're the last person that should be talking about an agenda.

You didn't try debating me, you kept coming at me false information and some stupid notion that I said all unemployed people would vote for Obama, which I never said. I even corrected myself to say that most freeloaders would vote for Obama (obviously a few will vote for Obama) and then you started attacking personally. If that is your way of debating then you need a lot of polish.