Mitt Romney calls half of America freeloaders

[Thepaindispenser]

Riot as classy as ever.

Susan Rice doesn't go on Sunday shows with that lame excuse without Obama's prodding, Obama's asks Google to take down the video, the police suddenly show up at the filmmaker's door, open your eyes Riot.

Where is Obama's statement saying that I may not agree with the content of the film but I defend the filmmaker's right to free speech?

JMS you completely misread my post, a person collecting social security most likely worked their entire lives and paid into social security and a person who lost their job paid into unemployment and if they want to find a job are not mooching off of society. However lazy freeloaders who want freebies from the government without contributing are entitled, selfish losers who are clearly voting for their sugar daddy Obama.

Those LIRR injury faking scumbag scamming retirees now there are some solid Obama voters

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

However lazy freeloaders who want freebies from the government without contributing are entitled, selfish losers who are clearly voting for their sugar daddy Obama.

Just curious how you know this to be true. Are you suggesting there are no lazy freeloaders voting for Romney? Here are the unemployment numbers for a few states from July.

MISSISSIPPI 9.1%
GEORGIA 9.3%
SOUTH CAROLINA 9.6%

Guess who a majority of the people from these states are voting for in November?

[Dahoss]

Obama should have went on the Kelly Ripa and Michael Strahan show. Everyone knows that where the cool kids go, right Mitt?

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Just curious how you know this to be true. Are you suggesting there are no lazy freeloaders voting for Romney? Here are the unemployment numbers for a few states from July.

MISSISSIPPI 9.1%
GEORGIA 9.3%
SOUTH CAROLINA 9.6%

Guess who a majority of the people from these states are voting for in November?

I never said unemployed people are freeloaders, there are plenty of unemployed people out there who would love to be working but Obama has failed them. A freeloader is someone who takes from the government and makes no effort to compete.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I never said unemployed people are freeloaders, there are plenty of unemployed people out there who would love to be working but Obama has failed them. A freeloader is someone who takes from the government and makes no effort to compete.

Dear Pain,

It's not about you bro. It's Mitt the true FinancialPainDispenser everyone is talking about. I guess it is a Generation Me thing.

Regards,
Jms62

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by jms62

Dear Pain,

It's not about you bro. It's Mitt the true FinancialPainDispenser everyone is talking about. I guess it is a Generation Me thing.

Regards,
Jms62

Sorry I disagree, I don't think hooking people on gov't dependency by throwing them some scraps so they can barely survive in exchange for their votes so those politicians can live the high life off of our money while shrinking the overall pie and lowering the standard of living for everyone is the answer. Europe has tried it and they are going broke. They would have gone broke a lot sooner if we hadn't paid for their defense all these years.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I never said unemployed people are freeloaders, there are plenty of unemployed people out there who would love to be working but Obama has failed them. A freeloader is someone who takes from the government and makes no effort to compete.

Let's try this again. YOU said all of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama, which is obviously not true.

So, in red dominated states, with those unemployment rates, wouldn't common sense lead you to think there is a decent number of freeloaders as well?

The point is there are (a lot) freeloaders on both sides. The right doesn't like talking about and you'll never see Fox News talk about it, but let's pretend it doesn't happen.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Let's try this again. YOU said all of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama, which is obviously not true.

So, in red dominated states, with those unemployment rates, wouldn't common sense lead you to think there is a decent number of freeloaders as well?

The point is there are (a lot) freeloaders on both sides. The right doesn't like talking about and you'll never see Fox News talk about it, but let's pretend it doesn't happen.

Dahoss, I am not sure why you are equating the unemployment rate with freeloaders. The unemployment rate only counts people who are actively looking for work. Lazy, freeloaders don't look for work.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Dahoss, I am not sure why you are equating the unemployment rate with freeloaders. The unemployment rate only counts people who are actively looking for work. Lazy, freeloaders don't look for work.

For a supposedly smart guy, you sure are playing dumb here.

One more time, even slower. You said ALL of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama.

That is false. So do you want to keep talking around it, or are you just going to admit you're talking out of your ass?

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

For a supposedly smart guy, you sure are playing dumb here.

One more time, even slower. You said ALL of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama.

That is false. So do you want to keep talking around it, or are you just going to admit you're talking out of your ass?

I stand by my statement, what incentive does a lazy, freeloader have to vote for Romney? Are you going to admit that you were unaware of what the unemployment number means? It only counts people actively looking for work.

so now the thread is about taxes?

Pardon me while I go piss in the wind for a moment.

We were beyond taxes fixing the issue back in 2002. All of the decisions were made by then and there is not a god damn thing you or I can do about it.

So feel free to pay more taxes if you'd like. Remember to be a good slave and pay extra to the Federal Reserve.

YOU ARE BEING NAIVE, FUC.KERS. WE'RE GOING OFF THAT FISCAL CLIFF WHETHER THEY TAKE ALL YOUR GOD-DAMNED MONEY AND GIVE IT TO EVERY MEXICAN ON EARTH.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Riot as classy as ever.

Susan Rice doesn't go on Sunday shows with that lame excuse without Obama's prodding, Obama's asks Google to take down the video, the police suddenly show up at the filmmaker's door, open your eyes Riot.

Where is Obama's statement saying that I may not agree with the content of the film but I defend the filmmaker's right to free speech?

JMS you completely misread my post, a person collecting social security most likely worked their entire lives and paid into social security and a person who lost their job paid into unemployment and if they want to find a job are not mooching off of society. However lazy freeloaders who want freebies from the government without contributing are entitled, selfish losers who are clearly voting for their sugar daddy Obama.

Those LIRR injury faking scumbag scamming retirees now there are some solid Obama voters

You then are the one that needs to go back and read what Mitt said. They are included in the 47% along with someone working 2 minimum wage jobs and receiving food stamps trying to feed their family cause they lost thier job of 40 years to line Mitts pockets because Bain came in and inflicted their Pain and outsourced their entire division to India.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by jms62

You then are the one that needs to go back and read what Mitt said. They are included in the 47% along with someone working 2 minimum wage jobs and receiving food stamps trying to feed their family cause they lost thier job of 40 years to line Mitts pockets because Bain came in and inflicted their Pain and outsourced their entire division to India.

I know what he said, he said people dependent on government would most likely vote for Obama. He never said anything about not working for them or that he wouldn't help them as President. He was talking about voting and he is right there are too many freeloaders in this country leeching off of us hardworking taxpayers. If you want to keep going towards Europe's culture of dependency which breeds malaise, no growth, a lower standard of living, laziness, no charity, selfishness, and an upper class which consists of politicians then go ahead and vote for Obama.

I would rather vote for the guy who has the guts to standby his comments of the problem of too many people being dependent on government than the one who runs away from his comment on hardworking people not building their businesses when you know he meant it.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I know what he said, he said people dependent on government would most likely vote for Obama. He never said anything about not working for them or that he wouldn't help them as President. He was talking about voting and he is right there are too many freeloaders in this country leeching off of us hardworking taxpayers. If you want to keep going towards Europe's culture of dependency which breeds malaise, no growth, a lower standard of living, laziness, no charity, selfishness, and an upper class which consists of politicians then go ahead and vote for Obama.

I would rather vote for the guy who has the guts to standby his comments of the problem of too many people being dependent on government than the one who runs away from his comment on hardworking people not building their businesses when you know he meant it.

Dude Guys like Mitt borrowing at low rates from banks which borrow at even lowernrates from the Fed which is my and your tax dollars buying companies and setting themselves up wit huge managment fees, firing people and shipping jobs overseas which means less money going into our economy and taxes and more money spent in unemployment for them is the problem. He is a Vampire sucking capital out our economy for himself. Does not sound presidential to me.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by jms62

Dude Guys like Mitt borrowing at low rates from banks which borrow at even lowernrates from the Fed which is my and your tax dollars buying companies and setting themselves up wit huge managment fees, firing people and shipping jobs overseas which means less money going into our economy and taxes and more money spent in unemployment for them is the problem. He is a Vampire sucking capital out our economy for himself. Does not sound presidential to me.

I think you are giving a bit of exaggerated view of what companies like Bain Capital actually do. There are plenty of private equity firms who buy companies in my business and keep them here. Cory Booker knows it, companies like this are needed to clean up inefficient companies and keep them floating, it doesn't always work.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I think you are giving a bit of exaggerated view of what companies like Bain Capital actually do. There are plenty of private equity firms who buy companies in my business and keep them here. Cory Booker knows it, companies like this are needed to clean up inefficient companies and keep them floating, it doesn't always work.

No I am not at all. You are stuck in the 80's Michael Douglas movie where "Greed is Good"; Where "Trickle Down" didn't mean PISS on. Now it is all about clear cutting and strip mining the American Economy for the benefit of a privliged few and leaving a vast barren wasteland in your swath. If that wasn't the case then WHY THE **** ARE WE Here right now? And you want to put someone in Office that was a CHIEF Engineer of that methodology, Someone who thinks Banks are Overregulated even after they gutted us?? Are you serious?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...pital-20120829

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by jms62

No I am not at all. You are stuck in the 80's Michael Douglas movie where "Greed is Good"; Where "Trickle Down" didn't mean PISS on. Now it is all about clear cutting and strip mining the American Economy for the benefit of a privliged few and leaving a vast barren wasteland in your swath. If that wasn't the case then WHY THE **** ARE WE Here right now? And you want to put someone in Office that was a CHIEF Engineer of that methodology, Someone who thinks Banks are Overregulated even after they gutted us?? Are you serious?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...pital-20120829

Again I disagree with you. You are putting way too much trust in an incompetent and corrupt government to help people. If big government really helps people then why does every blighted and crime-ridden area in this country consistently vote Democrat and every single one of those areas, with the exception of the non-government phenomenon of gentrification, get poorer and more crime-ridden?

Like I said I don't think shrinking the pie and having an all powerful government decide who gets what is the answer.

It wasn't banks that got us into this mess, it was Democrats forcing banks to lend money for mortgages to people who never had a chance of repaying them. Who said banks shouldn't be regulated to some degree? However this current Dodd-Frank thing is a disaster, it leaves to-big-to-fail in there and it is designed to make the banks dependent on the politicians so that they can fatten their campaign coffers with cash.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I know what he said, he said people dependent on government would most likely vote for Obama. He never said anything about not working for them or that he wouldn't help them as President. He was talking about voting and he is right there are too many freeloaders in this country leeching off of us hardworking taxpayers. If you want to keep going towards Europe's culture of dependency which breeds malaise, no growth, a lower standard of living, laziness, no charity, selfishness, and an upper class which consists of politicians then go ahead and vote for Obama.

I would rather vote for the guy who has the guts to standby his comments of the problem of too many people being dependent on government than the one who runs away from his comment on hardworking people not building their businesses when you know he meant it.

yeah, he just said 'it's not my job to worry about them'.


and mitt romney doesn't give a rats ass about you or anyone. he wants to be president-the only people he will worry about helping are those like him. and that doesn't include you, or me, or anyone else who isn't a rich guy like him.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Danzig

yeah, he just said 'it's not my job to worry about them'.


and mitt romney doesn't give a rats ass about you or anyone. he wants to be president-the only people he will worry about helping are those like him. and that doesn't include you, or me, or anyone else who isn't a rich guy like him.

That is not what he said. He said it wasn't his job to worry about getting them to vote for him, take another listen to it.

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

That is not what he said. He said it wasn't his job to worry about getting them to vote for him, take another listen to it.

Zig after you see the actual words - what is so terrible about the way he answered a specific question ?


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...y-secret-video

Audience member: For the last three years, all everybody's been told is, "Don't worry, we'll take care of you." How are you going to do it, in two months before the elections, to convince everybody you've got to take care of yourself?

Romney: There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. And I mean, the president starts off with 48, 49, 48—he starts off with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn't connect. And he'll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. I mean that's what they sell every four years. And so my job is not to worry about those people—I'll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the 5 to 10 percent in the center that are independents that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon in some cases emotion, whether they like the guy or not, what it looks like. I mean, when you ask those people…we do all these polls—I find it amazing—we poll all these people, see where you stand on the polls, but 45 percent of the people will go with a Republican, and 48 or 4…

[Recording stops.]