![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
i agree that it has stirred up passion, but that is a good thing i think. we need a shot of passion in this sport every once in awhile. my only point has been that it seems genuinely unfair to give one track a pass on a false claim, while we all know if it was santa anita, hollywood or belmont they wouldnt be granted the same pass that monmouth is in some peoples eyes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Just because a track has a certain amount of purse money to be paid out doesnt mean that every penny of that money gets paid out. Most tracks underpay purses in order to have a cushion going into the next meet. Because other tracks dont make you aware of the total amount of purse money that is projeted to be distributed doesnt mean that this track has made any false claims. Because you dont understand the way the system works doesnt make it wrong. When figuring the purses Monmouth determined that over the course of the meet they knew that X amount was going to be alloted for stakes races. That number is almost surely going to be hit unless a stake was cancelled due to lack of entries which is highly unlikely. Then they took into consideration the Jersey bred races and figured in the number of races and hence purses that they are contractually bound to run. Then they determine the amount of each specific claiming, maiden and allowance races that they will write which will finish off their projections. While an exact number is hard to achieve they would have a pretty good idea of how much they would be paying out. Ok now we get to reality. Perhaps some of the allowance races (high purse) do not fill and are replaced by a greater number of races like those which were found on yesterdays card(lower purse)? All of a sudden the projections that they made arent going to reach the million dollar mark because those races carry a much smaller purse than the scheduled but not filled allowance races. Was it the tracks intent to fill those races and give away the alloted money? Of course. Do they supply the horses for those races that didnt fill? Of course not. Assuming that all the allowances races especially the money allowances and higher classes would all fill all the time is contrary to what is happening at all tracks. It is hardly an exact science writing races and filling cards especially the way the horses are raced nowdays. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
i understand the way the system works. its pretty arrogant to think i dont as you have no idea what my experience is. i also understand that you cant look at the way other tracks do business and compare it to this meet because there is no guarantee there will even be racing in new jersey next year if this isnt a big success. it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
People here make proclamations of certainty all the time that aren't true. Do you think that the horseman's association isn't aware with how much has been paid out? Do you think they do not monitor the numbers? You understand that they are contractually obligated to do this? Perhaps Monmouth will add money to the purses toward the end of the meet? Perhaps they will add money to the stakes as well? Perhaps they will simply carry the money forward to the fall meet and increase the purse levels there? Perhaps all the races on haskell day will be boosted to 100k? Perhaps they will have a big party with the money? As for the idea that there will be no racing in NJ if this isnt a big success...If that is so (and all signs are that it is) then why would they underpay the purses? To save the money for a meet that wont take place? They have a 12 million dollar stakes schedule. Through this weekend they will have paid out 3 million. After 36% of the meet they have only paid out 25% of the stakes money. That means obviously that the purses paid out on an average daily basis will be higher as the meet goes on. The uniqueness of the meet really isnt that it may be the last, etc. It is that they have scheduled two seperate meets with completely different purse structures. If there arent enough quality horses to fill all the scheduled allowance races during the first meet would it not make sense to hold over some of that money to the next meet as opposed to giving it away senselessly to keep up with some marketing slogan? I have no idea what they are doing nor do I really care. But the idea that each day would have $1 million dollars in purses is not only silly but easily refuted simply by looking at a condition book. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
like i said, it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet. im sure you still wont care then either, after being proven wrong. again. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Let me ask you a question GG. How close to $50 million do they have to give out for you not to declare that they never intended to give out the $50 million? $45 mill? $48mill? $49,999,999?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() regulated? you got regulated on page 2 of this thread.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The bottom line is that there is a lot of defensive nitpicking in this thread. The gist of the original argument by Byk is correct. Nobody is criticizing the Monmouth meet from a fan's perspective ( nor should they ). But there is an underlying discussion, a white Elephant so to speak, and frankly this thread is making that even more abundantly clear.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|