Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2010, 12:00 AM
Gaining Ground Gaining Ground is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Perhaps you should educate yourself by reading some of the other threads on this topic. It's been very polarizing around here.
im pretty educated on the topic but thanks for the advice. will reading the other threads somehow make monmouths claims true?

im not trying to be a wiseguy, but so far in this thread ive been called a moron and told that since i dont own horses at monmouth i shouldnt be concerned with purse structure. this entire thing isnt a big deal as monmouth will still give away a lot of money and have increased handle.

however after reading some threads here about other circuits i cant help but think about what the response would be if the same claims were made by other circuits and were in fact overexaggerated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2010, 12:12 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaining Ground View Post
im pretty educated on the topic but thanks for the advice. will reading the other threads somehow make monmouths claims true?

im not trying to be a wiseguy, but so far in this thread ive been called a moron and told that since i dont own horses at monmouth i shouldnt be concerned with purse structure. this entire thing isnt a big deal as monmouth will still give away a lot of money and have increased handle.

however after reading some threads here about other circuits i cant help but think about what the response would be if the same claims were made by other circuits and were in fact overexaggerated.
Not trying to be a wiseguy? Wanna take back what you said to me earlier?(which I avoided to this point...)

As for reading the other posts, I'm not referring to the structure discussion but rather the passion on one side or the other this has created. I don't know why it has but this thread has just continued that.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2010, 12:21 AM
Gaining Ground Gaining Ground is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski View Post
Not trying to be a wiseguy? Wanna take back what you said to me earlier?(which I avoided to this point...)

As for reading the other posts, I'm not referring to the structure discussion but rather the passion on one side or the other this has created. I don't know why it has but this thread has just continued that.
if i recall correctly you started the mudslinging with the wake me up line. unless i wasnt one of the apologists you were referring to. i pointed out that what you were talking about had nothing to do with the topic. you keep wanting to move the topic away from what it is.

i agree that it has stirred up passion, but that is a good thing i think. we need a shot of passion in this sport every once in awhile. my only point has been that it seems genuinely unfair to give one track a pass on a false claim, while we all know if it was santa anita, hollywood or belmont they wouldnt be granted the same pass that monmouth is in some peoples eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2010, 05:39 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaining Ground View Post
if i recall correctly you started the mudslinging with the wake me up line. unless i wasnt one of the apologists you were referring to. i pointed out that what you were talking about had nothing to do with the topic. you keep wanting to move the topic away from what it is.

i agree that it has stirred up passion, but that is a good thing i think. we need a shot of passion in this sport every once in awhile. my only point has been that it seems genuinely unfair to give one track a pass on a false claim, while we all know if it was santa anita, hollywood or belmont they wouldnt be granted the same pass that monmouth is in some peoples eyes.
Why is it that you dont seem to understand that there have been no false claims made? They had 50 million dollars to payout over 50 days? Is that a fact or not? Does 50 million divided by 50 days not average 1 million a day?

Just because a track has a certain amount of purse money to be paid out doesnt mean that every penny of that money gets paid out. Most tracks underpay purses in order to have a cushion going into the next meet. Because other tracks dont make you aware of the total amount of purse money that is projeted to be distributed doesnt mean that this track has made any false claims. Because you dont understand the way the system works doesnt make it wrong.

When figuring the purses Monmouth determined that over the course of the meet they knew that X amount was going to be alloted for stakes races. That number is almost surely going to be hit unless a stake was cancelled due to lack of entries which is highly unlikely. Then they took into consideration the Jersey bred races and figured in the number of races and hence purses that they are contractually bound to run. Then they determine the amount of each specific claiming, maiden and allowance races that they will write which will finish off their projections. While an exact number is hard to achieve they would have a pretty good idea of how much they would be paying out. Ok now we get to reality. Perhaps some of the allowance races (high purse) do not fill and are replaced by a greater number of races like those which were found on yesterdays card(lower purse)? All of a sudden the projections that they made arent going to reach the million dollar mark because those races carry a much smaller purse than the scheduled but not filled allowance races. Was it the tracks intent to fill those races and give away the alloted money? Of course. Do they supply the horses for those races that didnt fill? Of course not. Assuming that all the allowances races especially the money allowances and higher classes would all fill all the time is contrary to what is happening at all tracks. It is hardly an exact science writing races and filling cards especially the way the horses are raced nowdays.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2010, 01:04 PM
Gaining Ground Gaining Ground is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Why is it that you dont seem to understand that there have been no false claims made? They had 50 million dollars to payout over 50 days? Is that a fact or not? Does 50 million divided by 50 days not average 1 million a day?

Just because a track has a certain amount of purse money to be paid out doesnt mean that every penny of that money gets paid out. Most tracks underpay purses in order to have a cushion going into the next meet. Because other tracks dont make you aware of the total amount of purse money that is projeted to be distributed doesnt mean that this track has made any false claims. Because you dont understand the way the system works doesnt make it wrong.

When figuring the purses Monmouth determined that over the course of the meet they knew that X amount was going to be alloted for stakes races. That number is almost surely going to be hit unless a stake was cancelled due to lack of entries which is highly unlikely. Then they took into consideration the Jersey bred races and figured in the number of races and hence purses that they are contractually bound to run. Then they determine the amount of each specific claiming, maiden and allowance races that they will write which will finish off their projections. While an exact number is hard to achieve they would have a pretty good idea of how much they would be paying out. Ok now we get to reality. Perhaps some of the allowance races (high purse) do not fill and are replaced by a greater number of races like those which were found on yesterdays card(lower purse)? All of a sudden the projections that they made arent going to reach the million dollar mark because those races carry a much smaller purse than the scheduled but not filled allowance races. Was it the tracks intent to fill those races and give away the alloted money? Of course. Do they supply the horses for those races that didnt fill? Of course not. Assuming that all the allowances races especially the money allowances and higher classes would all fill all the time is contrary to what is happening at all tracks. It is hardly an exact science writing races and filling cards especially the way the horses are raced nowdays.
heres what i understand. there is no chance they give out 50 million in 50 days. it wasnt going to happen from the beginning and 2 or 3 days of 2-3 million a day will still not make them close. that is fine. they have still done some good things.

i understand the way the system works. its pretty arrogant to think i dont as you have no idea what my experience is. i also understand that you cant look at the way other tracks do business and compare it to this meet because there is no guarantee there will even be racing in new jersey next year if this isnt a big success.

it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2010, 01:42 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaining Ground View Post
heres what i understand. there is no chance they give out 50 million in 50 days. it wasn't going to happen from the beginning and 2 or 3 days of 2-3 million a day will still not make them close. that is fine. they have still done some good things.

i understand the way the system works. its pretty arrogant to think i dint as you have no idea what my experience is. i also understand that you cant look at the way other tracks do business and compare it to this meet because there is no guarantee there will even be racing in new jersey next year if this isn't a big success.

it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet.
I dont have to know what your experience level is when you claim that Monmouth was using "false advertising". That shows that you seemingly dont understand the way purses are distributed.

People here make proclamations of certainty all the time that aren't true. Do you think that the horseman's association isn't aware with how much has been paid out? Do you think they do not monitor the numbers? You understand that they are contractually obligated to do this? Perhaps Monmouth will add money to the purses toward the end of the meet? Perhaps they will add money to the stakes as well? Perhaps they will simply carry the money forward to the fall meet and increase the purse levels there? Perhaps all the races on haskell day will be boosted to 100k? Perhaps they will have a big party with the money?

As for the idea that there will be no racing in NJ if this isnt a big success...If that is so (and all signs are that it is) then why would they underpay the purses? To save the money for a meet that wont take place? They have a 12 million dollar stakes schedule. Through this weekend they will have paid out 3 million. After 36% of the meet they have only paid out 25% of the stakes money. That means obviously that the purses paid out on an average daily basis will be higher as the meet goes on. The uniqueness of the meet really isnt that it may be the last, etc. It is that they have scheduled two seperate meets with completely different purse structures. If there arent enough quality horses to fill all the scheduled allowance races during the first meet would it not make sense to hold over some of that money to the next meet as opposed to giving it away senselessly to keep up with some marketing slogan? I have no idea what they are doing nor do I really care. But the idea that each day would have $1 million dollars in purses is not only silly but easily refuted simply by looking at a condition book.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2010, 01:56 PM
Gaining Ground Gaining Ground is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
I dont have to know what your experience level is when you claim that Monmouth was using "false advertising". That shows that you seemingly dont understand the way purses are distributed.

People here make proclamations of certainty all the time that aren't true. Do you think that the horseman's association isn't aware with how much has been paid out? Do you think they do not monitor the numbers? You understand that they are contractually obligated to do this? Perhaps Monmouth will add money to the purses toward the end of the meet? Perhaps they will add money to the stakes as well? Perhaps they will simply carry the money forward to the fall meet and increase the purse levels there? Perhaps all the races on haskell day will be boosted to 100k? Perhaps they will have a big party with the money?

As for the idea that there will be no racing in NJ if this isnt a big success...If that is so (and all signs are that it is) then why would they underpay the purses? To save the money for a meet that wont take place? They have a 12 million dollar stakes schedule. Through this weekend they will have paid out 3 million. After 36% of the meet they have only paid out 25% of the stakes money. That means obviously that the purses paid out on an average daily basis will be higher as the meet goes on. The uniqueness of the meet really isnt that it may be the last, etc. It is that they have scheduled two seperate meets with completely different purse structures. If there arent enough quality horses to fill all the scheduled allowance races during the first meet would it not make sense to hold over some of that money to the next meet as opposed to giving it away senselessly to keep up with some marketing slogan? I have no idea what they are doing nor do I really care. But the idea that each day would have $1 million dollars in purses is not only silly but easily refuted simply by looking at a condition book.
again no one is suggesting 1 million a day. they arent going to come close to averaging that. instead of just admitting you were wrong, you brush it off by saying "i really dont care" which is a bs copout. i already told you i was being sarcastic with the false advertising comment. you can cling to the unimportant stuff, while trying to excuse the crux of this thread but it doesnt change what is really happening. they were never going to be giving out 50 million in 50 days. never.

like i said, it will be interesting to revisit this thread after the meet. im sure you still wont care then either, after being proven wrong. again.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2010, 02:24 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

The bottom line is that there is a lot of defensive nitpicking in this thread. The gist of the original argument by Byk is correct. Nobody is criticizing the Monmouth meet from a fan's perspective ( nor should they ). But there is an underlying discussion, a white Elephant so to speak, and frankly this thread is making that even more abundantly clear.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2010, 02:25 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Why is it that you dont seem to understand that there have been no false claims made? They had 50 million dollars to payout over 50 days? Is that a fact or not? Does 50 million divided by 50 days not average 1 million a day?

Just because a track has a certain amount of purse money to be paid out doesnt mean that every penny of that money gets paid out. Most tracks underpay purses in order to have a cushion going into the next meet. Because other tracks dont make you aware of the total amount of purse money that is projeted to be distributed doesnt mean that this track has made any false claims. Because you dont understand the way the system works doesnt make it wrong.

When figuring the purses Monmouth determined that over the course of the meet they knew that X amount was going to be alloted for stakes races. That number is almost surely going to be hit unless a stake was cancelled due to lack of entries which is highly unlikely. Then they took into consideration the Jersey bred races and figured in the number of races and hence purses that they are contractually bound to run. Then they determine the amount of each specific claiming, maiden and allowance races that they will write which will finish off their projections. While an exact number is hard to achieve they would have a pretty good idea of how much they would be paying out. Ok now we get to reality. Perhaps some of the allowance races (high purse) do not fill and are replaced by a greater number of races like those which were found on yesterdays card(lower purse)? All of a sudden the projections that they made arent going to reach the million dollar mark because those races carry a much smaller purse than the scheduled but not filled allowance races. Was it the tracks intent to fill those races and give away the alloted money? Of course. Do they supply the horses for those races that didnt fill? Of course not. Assuming that all the allowances races especially the money allowances and higher classes would all fill all the time is contrary to what is happening at all tracks. It is hardly an exact science writing races and filling cards especially the way the horses are raced nowdays.
Please stop making sense about this... and continue having emotional outbursts...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.