![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I love the false equivalence marathon going on here. So because Linda Rice made a smart claim that she eventually turned into a G1 horse, that's the same as Dutrow and his "paramour" ROUTINELY moving horses way up in their FIRST STARTS off the claim. It takes a serious bias or willful ignorance to explain all that away as nothing more than good horsemanship.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So smart claims are exclusive to people who "we" deem to be highly skilled professionals, that the peanut gallery is of the opinion are "clean". So people like Michele Nevin aren't capable of making successful claims that the "clean" trainers are privy to because we assume they are cheating.. #Gotcha.. Now its crystal clear, depending on your name we judge skill vs. chemicals. Proof is not necessary just the pronunciation of your last name in determining judgement.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
until or unless someone is found to be dirty, i will have to think they're clean. consistently getting caught with violations-well, how would anyone trust they're clean? Last edited by Danzig : 08-07-2014 at 11:08 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michele Nevin has violations?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i have no idea, nor have i ever called her a juicer.
i can count on one hand the trainers i've mentioned on here that are many times over rule breakers. she's not one of them. |