![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, he happened to catch more than a few coattails to ride. He was clutch, but hardly a great player.
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think everyone would pretty much agree with this, except maybe Skip Bayless and his lot.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But I never called him great. I said he was an OK defender, OK rebounder and super clutch.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How does he compare to Ewing and Barkley...you know, the selfish scorers with no rings you brought up earlier?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I brought them up in comparision to Melo and I also said thats fine. Nothing wrong with being an all time great regular season guy.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How about Gary Payton? Did winning a ring with the Heat legitimize him as a great player? I just don't think you can categorize players as great, just because they won a championship. Gary Payton was great with or without a ring.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ba...1742--nba.html |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I remember the first time I saw him play. I was at U of AZ and Oregon State came into town and Payton was just great that night. This was 1987 I think and we had no internet and West Coast games were hardly ever on except when UCLA played someone. I saw this guy who was the best player on the floor playing against a team with 4 future NBA players that was going to the Final 4 that year and I hadnt ever even heard of him. AZ won because Oregon state wasnt that good but he just dominated Kerr and wound up guarding Elliot who was half a foot bigger than him.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Charles Barkley was a great player in the playoffs. He had some monstrous post seasons.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I love Chuck. Loved him then love him now.
|