Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-08-2013, 11:03 PM
Revidere's Avatar
Revidere Revidere is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 861
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by cakes44 View Post
So you're worried about JV, but you think Mike Smith is going to be able to get Palice Malice to stalk and pounce? The next time Smitty keeps a horse covered up who isn't in last will be his first in 5 years.
Good Call http : )
__________________
Revidere

Last edited by Revidere : 06-08-2013 at 11:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-08-2013, 11:52 PM
hondo's Avatar
hondo hondo is offline
Louisiana Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 337
Default

Doug ......great job analyzing this race, your pace analysis was spot on. You made me go back and look at Palace Malace and i had liked him from a breeding standpoint and I included him in both the multis and trifectas along with Oxbow who I thought was the best of the forwardly placed horses, Orb and Revolutionary. Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-09-2013, 07:53 AM
Calzone Lord's Avatar
Calzone Lord Calzone Lord is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,552
Default

Appreciate the kind words.

I have a lot of skill and a lot of experience with analyzing races run to extremes like this years Kentucky Derby was -- and making the best of it with horses next time out (again, I've been able to take certain aspects of CJ's brilliance with numbers and computers, and certain elements of trip handicapping, an area where I learned a lot from Serling in those old Siro's seminars of over 10 years ago -- and couple them with my own skills in those areas and situations. Listening, studying, and learning from those two guys in that specific area really helped advanced me a lot. And just the experience of being able to isolate and study those type of races, at every track, every class level, every surface, all over the country...you learn more and get better by doing and seeing, seeing and doing)

This is always going to be a humbling game at times. Look at my selections for the Kentucky Derby, and you'll see a complete swing and miss.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-09-2013, 08:45 AM
pweizer's Avatar
pweizer pweizer is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord View Post
Appreciate the kind words.

I have a lot of skill and a lot of experience with analyzing races run to extremes like this years Kentucky Derby was -- and making the best of it with horses next time out (again, I've been able to take certain aspects of CJ's brilliance with numbers and computers, and certain elements of trip handicapping, an area where I learned a lot from Serling in those old Siro's seminars of over 10 years ago -- and couple them with my own skills in those areas and situations. Listening, studying, and learning from those two guys in that specific area really helped advanced me a lot. And just the experience of being able to isolate and study those type of races, at every track, every class level, every surface, all over the country...you learn more and get better by doing and seeing, seeing and doing)

This is always going to be a humbling game at times. Look at my selections for the Kentucky Derby, and you'll see a complete swing and miss.

And yet both Jerry Bailey and Randy Moss were at a loss to explain what happened to Orb in the Preakness.

Bob Neumeier and Mike Battaglia said when they made their selections yesterday said that they couldn't understand why Orb ran so poorly in Baltimore.

Palace Malice found all kinds of trouble in the LA Derby, was too close to a race that collapsed in the Blue Grass, and of course set the insane pace in the Derby. He had a big right to improve. Yet none of the national media picked up on this at all.

You and Andy were out there early with this great analysis and deserve lots of credit.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-09-2013, 09:31 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Yesterday's 12th and 13th at Belmont were great examples of horses that were coming out of negative dynamics situations. Sky Blue Pink had been in one of the more curious slow pace turf races of the meet at Belmont, his first off a layoff, where as a closer he ended up making an outrageous wide middle move. He came back to finish second at a big price. The third finisher, Why Not Whiskey, was very surprisingly on the pace in his last, as he's a deep closer, when he was also coming off a layoff. This is a classic prep race for a layoff horse. It ended up being a tough beat with these horses finishing 2nd and 3rd, but over time you make plenty of money with these horses.

In the 13th, Foolish Tiger had gotten an oddly aggressive ride in his last, making early and middle moves in a race that collapsed. His prior efforts made him one of the reasonable contenders if the favorite didn't run to his out of town form ( which he didn't ). He won at 12:1.

There are plenty of these, of course, that don't work out, but they will outperform their odds over time.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-09-2013, 10:44 AM
cakes44's Avatar
cakes44 cakes44 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revidere View Post
Good Call http : )
I've got a gift. I ended up landing on Incognito...obviously to no avail. CL has been on point, no doubt.

On a side note, how many of the 14 horses in the race yesterday actually put in any kind of run at any point, like 4?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-09-2013, 03:44 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord View Post
Appreciate the kind words.

I have a lot of skill and a lot of experience with analyzing races run to extremes like this years Kentucky Derby was -- and making the best of it with horses next time out (again, I've been able to take certain aspects of CJ's brilliance with numbers and computers, and certain elements of trip handicapping, an area where I learned a lot from Serling in those old Siro's seminars of over 10 years ago -- and couple them with my own skills in those areas and situations. Listening, studying, and learning from those two guys in that specific area really helped advanced me a lot. And just the experience of being able to isolate and study those type of races, at every track, every class level, every surface, all over the country...you learn more and get better by doing and seeing, seeing and doing)

This is always going to be a humbling game at times. Look at my selections for the Kentucky Derby, and you'll see a complete swing and miss.
Come clean with the truth -- you only liked him because I said I liked him a week ago on facebook.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-09-2013, 03:47 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Yesterday's 12th and 13th at Belmont were great examples of horses that were coming out of negative dynamics situations. Sky Blue Pink had been in one of the more curious slow pace turf races of the meet at Belmont, his first off a layoff, where as a closer he ended up making an outrageous wide middle move. He came back to finish second at a big price. The third finisher, Why Not Whiskey, was very surprisingly on the pace in his last, as he's a deep closer, when he was also coming off a layoff. This is a classic prep race for a layoff horse. It ended up being a tough beat with these horses finishing 2nd and 3rd, but over time you make plenty of money with these horses.

In the 13th, Foolish Tiger had gotten an oddly aggressive ride in his last, making early and middle moves in a race that collapsed. His prior efforts made him one of the reasonable contenders if the favorite didn't run to his out of town form ( which he didn't ). He won at 12:1.

There are plenty of these, of course, that don't work out, but they will outperform their odds over time.
It could have potentially saved me a lot of heartbreak had I read this earlier about Foolish Tiger...
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-09-2013, 03:51 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sightseek View Post
It could have potentially saved me a lot of heartbreak had I read this earlier about Foolish Tiger...
I did say it on TV.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-09-2013, 04:05 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
I did say it on TV.
Yes, but I only bet that race in a Pick 4 and was alive with only the favorite and maybe the 4 if memory serves.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.