![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Montana: 3,409 completions, 5,391 attempts (63.3%), 40,551 yards, 273 TD's, 139 INT's, rating of 92.3 in what was essentially full 12 seasons Brady: 2,908 completions, 4,574 attempts (63.6%), 33,547 yards, 248 TD's, 103 INT's, rating of 94.3 in 8.75 seasons Elway: 4,123 completions, 7,250 attempts (56.8%), 51,475 yards, 300 TD's, 226 INT's in 16 seasons
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Didn't you say not too long ago that Moss was the best ever?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As for Moss' impact, even if you take out the crazy stats from the 16-0 regular season his #'s are still awesome.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() When NFL Network rated the top 100 players of all-time - they had a stupid rating system where they ask that players be rated from 1 to 10.
A guy like Jerry Rice who is as solid as it gets at a position that attracts douchebaggery is going to get 10's all over. That's how he ended up #1 overall over Jim Brown and all those great QB's. He's a friggen reciever - you have to draw up ways and sceme to get him the ball. A guy like Randy Moss is going to get 1's and 2's from a few people who simply don't like him. Peter King even said "he should have been and even could have been a lot higher - but anyone who says they don't work for their check - that guy isn't for me" That's how Moss ends up at #65. OJ Simpson ran for over 2,000 yards in a 14 game season on a team that was supposedly one dimensional. I bet a few people shaved a point or two off of his score because he murdered a couple of people. He should have been higher on a more rational system. Even Deoin has a point. A few people who didn't like his antics and couldn't stand him probably shaved a point or two off. |