The former Gulf of Mexico

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

so she obviously has an agenda and is short on facts at least in PW Sound so take her with a grain of salt.

She is completely anti-drilling (any drilling). But her facts are true - there is still oil on the beaches, and negative effects due to the EV spill.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

She is completely anti-drilling (any drilling). But her facts are true - there is still oil on the beaches, and negative effects due to the EV spill.

her portrail of the eco-system being barely sustainable is far from the truth but why let that get in her way.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

her portrail of the eco-system being barely sustainable is far from the truth but why let that get in her way.

Your own post regarding fishing supports it - small/med fish; big fish, best found at the mouth of the bay, not within the spill area, etc.

One person isn't the only scientist following the effects post EV. Plenty of duplicate information out there if you want to discount this person entirely.

Despite the extensive cleanup attempts, less than ten percent of the oil was recovered[15] and a study conducted by NOAA determined that as of early 2007 more than 26 thousand U.S. gallons (22,000 imp gal; 98,000 L) of oil remain in the sandy soil of the contaminated shoreline, declining at a rate of less than 4% per year.[16]

Both the long- and short-term effects of the oil spill have been studied comprehensively.[18] Thousands of animals died immediately; the best estimates include 100,000 to as many as 250,000 seabirds, at least 2,800 sea otters, approximately 12 river otters, 300 harbor seals, 247 bald eagles, and 22 orcas, as well as the destruction of billions of salmon and herring eggs.[5][19] The effects of the spill continued to be felt for many years afterwards. Overall reductions in population have been seen in various ocean animals, including stunted growth in pink salmon populations.[20] Sea otters and ducks also showed higher death rates in following years, partially because they ingested prey from contaminated soil and from ingestion of oil residues on hair due to grooming.[21]

Almost 20 years after the spill, a team of scientists at the University of North Carolina found that the effects are lasting far longer than expected.[20] The team estimates some shoreline Arctic habitats may take up to 30 years to recover.[5]

Exxon Mobil denies any concerns over this, [editorial comment: azzholes] stating that they anticipated a remaining fraction that they assert will not cause any long-term ecological impacts, according to the conclusions of 350 peer-reviewed studies.[21] However, a study from scientists from the NOAA concluded that this contamination can produce chronic low-level exposure, discourage subsistence where the contamination is heavy, and decrease the "wilderness character" of the area.[16]

I am amazed that some think there is no tipping point. That there exists no point where man can indeed permanently ruin this earth, and hasten our own destruction.