![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
He had NO chance to get the distance...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought he did the best he could with the horse he had. Haven't read the post-game comments from any connections yet.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobles Promise = Sam P... A pathetically overrated allowance horse that everyone keeps making excuses for. Throw Dublin in that category as well.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
He has been in 5 grade 1 races now and has earned a check in every one. Whether he can get a classic distance is another subject but he has proven he belongs at this level. No?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
at the level, yes. distance, probably not. is anyone really surprised a son of cuvee didn't hit the board at 1 1/4? i think 1 1/16th is as far as he wants. never off the board til he ran past that in arkansas and then yesterday.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
1st against nothing in the BC futurity over the plastic 3rd to the LaL (who had no excuse) over the plastic 2nd to LaL (who had no excuse) over the plastic Those are the only G1 board hits (anyone entered in a G1 "cashes" a check) Clearly that head beat against LaL in the Rebel was much the best this guy will ever do on dirt...And considering what was in that race now clearly makes the point that he was never a classic distance type - the Ark only reinforced that IMO although I didn't totally discount the trouble he encountered, if he had any shot at a mile and a quarter he should have showed it. Ice Box has the only legitimate bitch coming to him in the way that race was run - he was clearly the horse to beat - WM gave NP the best opportunity - he just is not that good. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
this is as comprehensively BAD as your opinion of Battle of Hastings yesterday. It's wrong, top to bottom. Of course, when someone like you, who is able to do some cashing, figure (i.e., externally) aided though it might be, can be so dead wrong when it comes to interpreting races, then it sort of puts into perspective why the game remains crushable. Nothing personal, of course. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Rest asssured Belmont will be Augusta National perfect before they dare place a nasty hoofprint over it.. After all it is all about keeping it perfect - not just the fact that it happens to be safe and green at the same time.... I hope you took advantage of the spectacularly clear pace/condition/-minus TRACKUS setup in the finale at Tampa today or the runaway 10-1 shot in the 9th at CD yesterday... Never personal Bro - I love your insight |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It also isn't as though he got dusted yesterday. He was beaten six lengths. I find it hard to believe you'll see a Cuvee get that close to a Derby win in the near future (or ever). |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you think that the horse ran very well given the setup, then, it follows, that you think that Willie did something wrong.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is crazy talk. Noble's Promise is way better than Sam P. Throwing out his faster than Sam P. figures, the fact that he's been able to do this well beyond a mile is remarkable in itself. He's a very nice horse. Dublin's also a good horse in the wrong hands.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
The quote confirms my original contention: McPeek is a CLOWN. His handling of this horse is like a cobbler being brought in as head mechanic for an Indy team.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clown, possibly, but im guessing one hell of a salesman
__________________
" I may leave here empty handed, but you aren't going anywhere " |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
McPeek found Curlin, Einstein, Take Charge Lady. Wasn't NP a 10K find? Some clown.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
at the worst willie m. moved abit to soon and MAYBE cost NP a 2nd or 3rd.
if they cut him back to 1m-1 1/16m, keep him on dirt and let wiilie m. on board. NP will be a force to be reckoned with, the rest of the year, with this group of 3y/os.
__________________
"Always keep your heads up and act like champions." Coach Paul Bryant |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Kent D== A rider Willie M=== B rider What a tandom. ![]() Last edited by VOL JACK : 05-02-2010 at 11:18 PM. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
yeah, Lukas has had a ton of TC success in recent years. I know his credentials, it doesn't mean that he's still a good 3-year-old trainer. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anyway, Pletcher trains nothing like Lukas. His philosophy is totally different from Lukas. They are polar opposites. If you listen to interviews with any of Lukas' former assistants, they are always asked what they learned from Lukas. You will notice that they never mentiong learning anything about training. When Kiaran McLaughlin was asked what he learned from Lukas, he said that he learned how to get owners and that type of thing. When Pletcher was asked the question, he said that he learned alot about organizational skills and how to run a big operation. You will never hear any of those guys say that they learned anything about training from Lukas. I totally agree with Ateam about Lukas. I know that you probably think Lukas' results speak for themselves but if you want to make that argument then you have to look at his results over the last 5 years also. He probably has the worst winning percentage in graded stakes races of any trainer in the country. |