![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
damn. i've never understood the attraction of this particular wager until you posted the retrospective. it's still not anything i would consider handicapping but unless you want to argue the sample size is too small, "all others" could be a good bet. even at 2-5 and assuming a conservative hit rate of 50% (pool 1 is 7/15 so i don't think 50% is unreasonable this much earlier) you either get a 40% return or lose everything. a long term expectation of 20% in roughly 5 months. annualized that and you're near 50%. i don't know anyone that would be unhappy with that return. |