What Obama meant to say

[randallscott35]

Well put.

http://blog.pacificlegal.org/2013/la...ncement-means/

[jms62]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Well put.

http://blog.pacificlegal.org/2013/la...ncement-means/

When you let the foxes write the rules for guarding the henhouse you shouldn't be surprised when chickens start to go missing. An indictment on the entire process. Dems obviously didn't read the ****ing law that was written by lobbyists for the healthcare industry.

[randallscott35]

Yes, he seems to think the use of executive orders is limitless.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Yes, he seems to think the use of executive orders is limitless.

i guess perception is reality. he has a way to go to catch his predecessor. he's about half of bush's total right now.
everyone has a way to go to catch fdr.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i guess perception is reality. he has a way to go to catch his predecessor. he's about half of bush's total right now.
everyone has a way to go to catch fdr.

And Bush was a dreadful President as well. Since you don't understand rule of law, I'm not going to waste my time. He thinks he can have his cake and eat it too. Unfortunately, in a three branch government, he can't execute the laws by choosing which aspects of laws to execute....Clinton would do things personally that showed he was a jerk, but he would have never done the things Obama has done.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

And Bush was a dreadful President as well. Since you don't understand rule of law, I'm not going to waste my time. He thinks he can have his cake and eat it too. Unfortunately, in a three branch government, he can't execute the laws by choosing which aspects of laws to execute....Clinton would do things personally that showed he was a jerk, but he would have never done the things Obama has done.

yes, he was dreadful. and please, don't try to say what i do or don't understand about rule of law.
we can disagree about certain things, but don't try to say what i know.

executive orders have been around since washington, who issued 8. now, neither of us like the aca law, but that doesn't have bearing on what he can and cannot issue.
i respect consistency, and it always amazes me when people have one set of rules for one group of people, and a different set of rules for others...repubs vs democrats for instance. tell me, did you complain about every bush executive order?
since obama is actually righting a wrong, you still feel he is out of place with this?

[randallscott35]

Ok, so Bush was dreadful, and yet you lib clowns on here can't admit what an out and out failure Obama has been. Instead you resort to silly instead of coming up with anything of an argument. I get it, you voted for him and its hard to admit he sucks. That's too bad.

[GPK]

Welp...I'm all caught up now.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

When you let the foxes write the rules for guarding the henhouse you shouldn't be surprised when chickens start to go missing. An indictment on the entire process. Dems obviously didn't read the ****ing law that was written by lobbyists for the healthcare industry.

too true.