Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2006, 08:56 AM
2Hot4TV's Avatar
2Hot4TV 2Hot4TV is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glendora
Posts: 2,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by repent
maybe,
but theres always the option of just installing a safer dirt surface.
or I dont know, maybe not making a rush to judement and determining that synthetic surfaces were the cure all without proper testing over longer periods of time.

all Hollywood had to do was take a visit to another cdsn owned track named Calder Racecourse.
they are doing just fine down there in a warm weather environment with a conventional dirt surface.

instead, after failing miserably the year before with their installation of a new turf course(caused the cancellation of all turf racing in the 2005 Winter meet), they proceeded to fail miserably in the current year with the installation of a new synthetic main track surface.
I dont even want to think about what they are going to f*ck up in 2007.
there are only 2 courses for them to mess up.
maybe they will decide to rebuild the grandstand out of straw and mud next year.
then when it blows over and they have to cancel the 2007 Summer meet, they can blame it on a study they did that found that the safest building construction materials for human racetrack wagerers was mud and straw.



Repent
Hollywood parks Turf course failed under the ownership of Chruchill downs due to thier do nothing to the facilities if we can't have slots.

Hollywood parks new owners have replaced both track surfaces because the former owners let it go the hell. Let's get this one right Chruchill Downs Management let Hollywood run down and the new owners are playing catch up and doing a very good job.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2006, 08:50 PM
repent repent is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Hot4TV
Hollywood parks Turf course failed under the ownership of Chruchill downs due to thier do nothing to the facilities if we can't have slots.

Hollywood parks new owners have replaced both track surfaces because the former owners let it go the hell. Let's get this one right Chruchill Downs Management let Hollywood run down and the new owners are playing catch up and doing a very good job.

thats just totally false.
new ownership installed a new main track that is unusable most days of the week.
how is that a good job?

I once rooted for Hollypark to get that "swing week" that they battle Santa Anita for.
now, I hope they get their dates reduced.
its terrible.
they should tear the damn thing down just like they had planned.



Repent
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2006, 11:13 AM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

2Hot4tv is right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2006, 11:56 PM
repent repent is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitas
2Hot4tv is right.
right about what?
new ownership has done nothing right except provide an example for other CA tracks of what NOT to do when installing a new surface.

maybe the others will learn from their mistakes.
I doubt it though.


Repent
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2006, 10:45 AM
2Hot4TV's Avatar
2Hot4TV 2Hot4TV is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glendora
Posts: 2,342
Default

Some people seek the truth and some have to be right. It's all really just blah, blah, blah, and it doesn't matter.
Hollywood making huge mistakes? I personnally have enjoyed the racing on Cushion track.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.