Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2013, 05:21 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
For those that are interested, handle was up double digits last year, which made gains this year extremely hard to achieve. Everything is relative.

My burying the fans, as Chuck suggested, was ultimately too much to overcome.

All kidding aside, take a look at the daily handle, the actual numbers, and every Saturday as well. Each time I would look at last year's numbers as we waited for this year's final tally, I was taken aback by the kind of numbers that we were up against.
Fair enough but wasn't last year the first year they did the Friday opening and the record number of days, which is why last year was up so much on a % basis?....The per race totals as I watch finishing totals look much less than the mid 2000 pools I used to see in terms of win place and show totals. Maybe people are playing more exotics and multirace wagers. I'm sure that's part of it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2013, 08:24 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Fair enough but wasn't last year the first year they did the Friday opening and the record number of days, which is why last year was up so much on a % basis?....The per race totals as I watch finishing totals look much less than the mid 2000 pools I used to see in terms of win place and show totals. Maybe people are playing more exotics and multirace wagers. I'm sure that's part of it.

No and don't be.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2013, 08:36 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
No and don't be.
So to be clear, the numbers this year were lower per day in handle compared to 2005, which by the way was lower than 2004 by 5% b/c of a gambling scandal....http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/sp...cing.html?_r=0

10 years later and no appreciable increase in daily handle for Saratoga and there is no concern and we can spin this anyway we want? All I said in the initial post was that it was a disappointment. I have no problem with NYRA and love Saratoga. But again it is nothing but defensive reactions regarding what is a weakish number. Just say that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2013, 08:55 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

And this comes off a spring/summer meet at Belmont with attendance down a staggering 14% year on year and handle on track which includes AQ/+rewards players down 10%....but if we don't mention it I assume it won't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2013, 09:13 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
And this comes off a spring/summer meet at Belmont with attendance down a staggering 14% year on year and handle on track which includes AQ/+rewards players down 10%....but if we don't mention it I assume it won't matter.
Randall, surely a little thought might help you understand the reason for the decline in attendance at Belmont. Here's a hint, check Belmont Day for each year.

I'm not going to have any debates with you here. I am at more than an unfair disadvantage, and throughout your history here it has been evident that you have your beliefs and they won't be changed. I wish you only the best, at the races as well as in life.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2013, 09:19 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Randall, surely a little thought might help you understand the reason for the decline in attendance at Belmont. Here's a hint, check Belmont Day for each year.

I'm not going to have any debates with you here. I am at more than an unfair disadvantage, and throughout your history here it has been evident that you have your beliefs and they won't be changed. I wish you only the best, at the races as well as in life.
And I you...except there was no triple crown on the line after Drug O'Neill scratched. And that may not have impacted the tickets already sold, but it surely impacted the walk-up...how that explains a 10% decline in handle is beyond me...again we can keep changing the bars however you would like...I just hate the idea that things have to be spun on the best horse racing message board we have as an industry. We all love the game.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2013, 08:58 PM
PSH's Avatar
PSH PSH is offline
Hollywood Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mill Valley, CA
Posts: 914
Default Turf Course

I play mainly turf racing and it seemed because of the lack of rain during the meet up to the last weekend made the turf course almost unplayable unless you had the ability to pick a lone speed type. I know it had an impact on off the pace types and I certainly passed a lot of races...
Probably just my issues...
__________________
"Everybody's honest, when they can afford to be."
Benny Binion
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2013, 09:09 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PSH View Post
I play mainly turf racing and it seemed because of the lack of rain during the meet up to the last weekend made the turf course almost unplayable unless you had the ability to pick a lone speed type. I know it had an impact on off the pace types and I certainly passed a lot of races...
Probably just my issues...
This was the case for about a week later in the meet, and was really more about being inside than speed. Hopefully we can take advantage of these trips at Belmont this Fall.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-04-2013, 06:18 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
So to be clear, the numbers this year were lower per day in handle compared to 2005, which by the way was lower than 2004 by 5% b/c of a gambling scandal....http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/sp...cing.html?_r=0

10 years later and no appreciable increase in daily handle for Saratoga and there is no concern and we can spin this anyway we want? All I said in the initial post was that it was a disappointment. I have no problem with NYRA and love Saratoga. But again it is nothing but defensive reactions regarding what is a weakish number. Just say that.
Considering that overall handle numbers industrywide have dropped significantly in 10 years isn't an expectation that Saratoga's numbers should have increased odd?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-04-2013, 07:08 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Considering that overall handle numbers industrywide have dropped significantly in 10 years isn't an expectation that Saratoga's numbers should have increased odd?
Nope. I think the point is more about what the future of racing is going to look like. The fact that Saratoga is not immune is surely relevant.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-05-2013, 06:54 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Nope. I think the point is more about what the future of racing is going to look like. The fact that Saratoga is not immune is surely relevant.
You are making no sense. Saratoga has bucked the trend and has not shown a decline in handle over 10 years when virtually every other track in America has. How is this a negative?

Are you just now figuring out handle has dropped in this country over the last 6 or 7 years? Or that handle is and has been moving off track?

Saratoga's numbers this season don't show anything really. They are well within the norm of what can be expected.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:16 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

If treading water is your goal then do a victory lap. The numbers are lower in daily handle than they were 12 years ago, even at Saratoga. The objective is to grow the pie. If you are a business with the same revenues as 12 years ago, you aren't happy. To say the numbers are meaningless is....Podunk tracks will be the first to go. All the slots in the world won't save handle as pols can easily redirect cash away from racing when they want to....There is now a casino around every corner in the US. There is competition for every gambling dollar (and many are hurting) that people have....Yes the fact that handle has declined most everywhere is obvious....except that Las Vegas is at a new high in terms of visitors this year. And car sales are back to 2007 levels, etc....things are getting better. It just isn't translating to racing....What to do to fix it? That's it. If it doesn't matter then let's not publish the numbers at all.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-04-2013, 11:53 AM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Considering that overall handle numbers industrywide have dropped significantly in 10 years isn't an expectation that Saratoga's numbers should have increased odd?
a good summer though per DRF

Handle on U.S. races up 4.7% in August, according to Equibase. Purses up 5.5%, and race days up 1%.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2013, 12:00 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up View Post
a good summer though per DRF

Handle on U.S. races up 4.7% in August, according to Equibase. Purses up 5.5%, and race days up 1%.
good!
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.