2013 will be tougher (Reuters)

[jms62]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Bullsh*t. Don't tell me I am stereotyping when I was not - simply looking for expenses that can be considered luxuries.

Government mandates do not lower costs - they never did.

Ok St. Joesph of Derby Trail. If you say you are not sterotyping than you must not be.. Then there should be no need to say "I'm not trying to sterotype here" as it is clear to all.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by jms62

Ok St. Joesph of Derby Trail. If you say you are not sterotyping than you must not be.. Then there should be no need to say "I'm not trying to sterotype here" as it is clear to all.

Escalade, no doubt...tattoos, perhaps...Armani? Who is he stereotyping? Me?

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Escalade, no doubt...tattoos, perhaps...Armani? Who is he stereotyping? Me?

I actually was trying to round it out - figuring that their might not be much overlap between the markets for tattoos and Armani suits, but who knows? Should I have said pocket watches and Rolexes? What would have been better? The point, as I already said, was that some people view their luxuries as worthy of paying for over time but not their medical care.

That's it.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by joeydb

I actually was trying to round it out - figuring that their might not be much overlap between the markets for tattoos and Armani suits, but who knows? Should I have said pocket watches and Rolexes? What would have been better? The point, as I already said, was that some people view their luxuries as worthy of paying for over time but not their medical care.

That's it.

I have lots of tattoos and generally wear Armani, Valentino or Versace for suits. I would never buy an Escalade though. But my wife works for a hospital so we have good health insurance...otherwise I probably would forgo having it to be honest.