![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I listened to Dale Roman's eloquent defense of race day use of Lasix. I also heard Shug question why an entire 2 year old race at Keeland the other day all horses were administered Lasix and adjunct. Has the breed dropped to the level now that all horses bleed in workouts? It doesn't make sense. What has the lifting of the race day drug ban done for NY racing? We raced for over 100 years with no drugs now in NY after 15 years of usage...we can't live without it. As far as I can see only the casino has improved racing in NY not drugs.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i guess some have just decided no matter what is said, or written, lasix is bad, mmmmkay. ![]()
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can racehorses bleed at other times besides workouts and races (eg., during routine gallops)? If so, is it safe or appropriate to give those horses lasix more frequently?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think it's just our diagnostic methods and knowledge have vastly improved. Now we see how much EIPH there actually is in horses. We used to diagnose only via seeing nosebleeds. About 30 years ago we started using regular bronchoscopy stallside to look down in the trachea. Now we can do well-funded scientific research on high-speed treadmills and alveolar lavage of the lungs themselves.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |