
02-16-2012, 04:49 PM
|
The Curragh
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manningtown, Colorado
Posts: 2,727
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
The above isn't the legal language of the settlement, it's the same summary that is listed on the settlement website and news articles.
You might ask the Governor's Attorney General, who was specially consulted to see if the Governor can take the money and use it outside of what is listed, and who is, aside from the Governor, the only one in the state government saying, "yes, I think it would be legal".
That Walker had to ask his Attorney General - and is NOT consulting the legislature or any other legal advice - shows Walker clearly knows his taking the money is outside the settlement use intentions.
But he has the Koch Brothers American's for Prosperity playing hundreds of thousands of dollars of ads saying Walker balanced the budget, and Walker knows that's a lie, and he has a $140 million deficit - so he's grabbing some of this money to try and cover his tracks before his recall election.
And that is why there is a lawsuit being filed against the Gov and Attorney General for it, on behalf of the citizens of Wisconsin. Because the Governor and Attorney General are beyond the accepted use of the monies, using it to pay off last year's bills, and NOT for housing-related city troubles.
|
Where does this statement reference MY language?
__________________
don't run out of ammo.
|