![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() He has not 1 relevant skill position player, the WR Thomas would be a nice 3 on most teams with a lot of upside. He is there 1.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If you do not have time to throw the ball, it wouldn't matter if you had Jerry Rice, Michael Irvin and Lynn Swann as your recievers.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Willis McGahee is alright. He's not Barry Sanders, but it could be a lot worse.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thomas looks like a 3 because Tebow throws the ball like Nuke LaLoosh. If he had Brady or Rogers throwing to him he would have 1200 yds. and double digit TD's.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brady makes mediocre receivers look much better than they are. Rodgers receivers are all good, and would be without Rodgers.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() where would they be without Brady ? when the Pats drafted them last year was there some big celebration about the 2 new Star can't miss Tight Ends we just drafted ? I think Brady has a lot to do with their success. Branch, Patton and a few others didn't do jack without Tom Terrific. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
and yeah, when you take a TE early in the 2nd round, there are high expectations.
__________________
|