Who says Obama does nothing positive

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Okay. Freeloader. Got it.

Really? This is your response? lol?


Maybe witchboy will lend you a spell to cast on people reading this thread so that they wont think you are a union shill

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Really? This is your response? lol?


Maybe witchboy will lend you a spell to cast on people reading this thread so that they wont think you are a union shill

^^^ runs out of facts, resorts to making personal insults and ad hominem attacks.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

^^^ runs out of facts, resorts to making personal insults and ad hominem attacks.

lol check post 47 for running out of facts


oh yeah you never had any, just predictable bs

[hi_im_god]

i was thinking the loudness of commercials was a non-partisan issue.

and chuck was being sincere.

seriously. who could be against this?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i was thinking the loudness of commercials was a non-partisan issue.

and chuck was being sincere.

seriously. who could be against this?

If a union worker or Obama was the one turning the volume button up then Riot would be against it. Maybe toll takers can do this job too while they soak up all that overtime working those killer hours.

And I was being sincere. I swear they make the late night commercials even louder than the daytime ones.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

If a union worker or Obama was the one turning the volume button up then Riot would be against it. Maybe toll takers can do this job too while they soak up all that overtime working those killer hours.

And I was being sincere. I swear they make the late night commercials even louder than the daytime ones.

You mean "for it". Duh.

And the best part is: if only Obama had anything whatsoever to do with this, other than simply signing a law that was sent to him.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

You mean "for it". Duh.

And the best part is: if only Obama had anything whatsoever to do with this, other than simply signing a law that was sent to him.

No duh you would be against the act if it meant harm to your 2 chief crushes, Obama or public service union members.

And Obama's signing of the act into law is a pretty important step no?
I mean he gets all this credit for Obamacare when Pelosi and Insurance companies wrote that law too.

At least the commercial act wont cost us so much money

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

No duh you would be against the act if it meant harm to your 2 chief crushes, Obama or public service union members.

It's kinda sad, the way you always have to fall back on ad hominem insults.

And Obama's signing of the act into law is a pretty important step no?

Yes. It makes what has existed as policy for some time now, a law. I'll look forward to your constant praise of Obama, as you watch TV and newly-muted commercials don't interrupt your phone calls

Of course, according to others here, Obama's signing the law is just proof of his incompetence, that he's not paying attention to "real" problems.