Who says Obama does nothing positive

Originally Posted by Riot

You moron. I'm agreeing with you.

No you aren't. You're giving Obama a pass for just being a "figurehead"

You're in love with him just admit it.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

No you aren't. You're giving Obama a pass for just being a "figurehead"

You're in love with him just admit it.

Obama is just a figurehead but Bush singlehandidly ruined the whole world.

makes sense.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Obama is just a figurehead but Bush singlehandidly ruined the whole world.

makes sense.

If you could actually understand what you read, you'd be dangerous.

All because Cheney convinced Bush he'd be a big man to avenge daddy, and we were justified [ = military-industrial complex ] to invade another country to steal oil. Billions of dollars shoveled into the maw of government contractors, friends of Bush-Cheney.


"Supreme Court elected Bush"

It takes a village to work Bush as a figurehead puppet (although not a very big one), and they did.

[Antitrust32]

oh thats right! The VICE president singlehandidly ruined the world!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

oh thats right! The VICE president singlehandidly ruined the world!

Sigh. No. Bigger. Try again.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Riot

Sigh. No. Bigger. Try again.

Bigger than Cheney?...no way anyone bigger than Darth Vader..

[Riot]

Originally Posted by bigrun

Bigger than Cheney?...no way anyone bigger than Darth Vader..

Darth was just the puppetmaster. Plenty of underlings involved in this one.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

No you aren't. You're giving Obama a pass for just being a "figurehead"

You're in love with him just admit it.

Pay attention to the important stuff. Exchanging Obama for Romney won't change much. Yes, the President is a figurehead. The Supreme Court chose our president in 2000. Congress-lobbyists has nothing to do with us, it's just a money-making revolving door, with the evangelical whack jobs of C-Street thrown in to try and make Uganda hate gays as much as they do via Dominionism.

We agree that our current government format must be eliminated. We just differ on how to go about it.

Originally Posted by Riot

Pay attention to the important stuff. Exchanging Obama for Romney won't change much. Yes, the President is a figurehead. The Supreme Court chose our president in 2000. Congress-lobbyists has nothing to do with us, it's just a money-making revolving door, with the evangelical whack jobs of C-Street thrown in to try and make Uganda hate gays as much as they do via Dominionism.

We agree that our current government format must be eliminated. We just differ on how to go about it.

Pay attention? That's rich.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Pay attention? That's rich.

Not as rich as thinking electing Ron Paul will change much.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

Not as rich as thinking electing Ron Paul will change much.

re-electing Obama changes nothing though.

all this hope and change in his election campaign in 08.. and all we have is no hope and some spare change in our pockets.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

re-electing Obama changes nothing though.

all this hope and change in his election campaign in 08.. and all we have is no hope and some spare change in our pockets.

W. Bush was owned by the oil industry and the military-industrial complex. Cheney was his puppetmaster. Obama is owned by Wall Street and is at best a moderate Republican in his own right.

Ron Paul could be President, but he can't do things alone. It is the Congress that needs changing, at an organic level. It's completely dysfunctional for us, it works only to put money in their own pockets. They don't even care about us. It's all kabuki to keep us placated.

[Honu]

If Congress and the Supreme court run the country then how did Bush alone ruin everything.....the Congress was controlled by Democrats for almost all of the years he was President. I have read it here many times about how the President cant do anything without Congressional support so which is it? The Presidents fault or the fault of the Democratic led Congress that supported his stupid azz?

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by Honu

If Congress and the Supreme court run the country then how did Bush alone ruin everything.....the Congress was controlled by Democrats for almost all of the years he was President. I have read it here many times about how the President cant do anything without Congressional support so which is it? The Presidents fault or the fault of the Democratic led Congress that supported his stupid azz?

the only time republicans didn't control at least one branch of congress was the last two years of his eight year term. they had both from 2003-2007. that's hardly "almost all the years he was president".

i don't think chuck was being ironic.

it's amazing how quickly threads are derailed.

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

the only time republicans didn't control at least one branch of congress was the last two years of his eight year term. they had both from 2003-2005. that's hardly "almost all the years he was president".

i don't think chuck was being ironic.

it's amazing how quickly threads are derailed.

You might be the most annoying person on the internet.

Out of all the threads to complain about derailment you choose this one? Ok, life of the party....

[clyde]

Originally Posted by Honu

If Congress and the Supreme court run the country then how did Bush alone ruin everything.....the Congress was controlled by Democrats for almost all of the years he was President. I have read it here many times about how the President cant do anything without Congressional support so which is it? The Presidents fault or the fault of the Democratic led Congress that supported his stupid azz?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z77L2...eature=related

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by clyde

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z77L2...eature=related

stop it!