![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
From the law you posted my guess is proving the for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy would be a problem unless Bolton is on record or known to be supporting someone else. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Unless he promised Bolton the position 'for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy' there was no law broken. No need to involve the Atty General. Besides he's too busy lying about supplying guns to mexican drug cartels.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Then you'd better tell the legal folks telling Newt to shut up not to worry about it.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't give a fly'n fck about Newt! Hope his legal folks back over him pulling out from dinner. Oh and Newt's giving Obama a big hug while they do it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I do not love Newt, but the word "offer" is your arguments undoing. Offer neither promises nor procures.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |