![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You made the charge, and I quote, "It's not but it's pretty close to (insert name) union supporting Obama and then being thrown billions back under the guise of creating jobs." So put up: Dell, what unions received money under the "guise", and what was the "guise" that didn't produce jobs? How much money did "the unions" receive?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
BTW I just saw the Chevy Silverado (GM) was the second most popular vehicle in October but only rep. for GM. Incidenty Ford, who received no, actually refused any bailout funds had the number one slot with the Ford F Series, the 4rth spot with the Escape, and the 6th spot with the Fusion. Only other American vehicle was the Dodge Ram. Hope at least for our sake GM realizes the American public still wants trucks and SUV's and not golf cart like cars. Until our almost 1/4 share in GM is dissolved the Federal Government should refrain from making any regulations or changes to the auto industry to avoid even the appearance of any conflict of interest. Last edited by dellinger63 : 12-07-2011 at 08:11 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The same with the money thrown at new road construction where the girl holding the SLOW sign is making $30/hr, kicks back to her union in dues and a check is sent to Re-Elect Obama or something similar. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But you said jobs were lost.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |