WI Governor Walker top aid under FBI investigation

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

Wiphan accused me of something that isn't true. Wiphan knows that. That's why he's changed the subject, and is trying to distract and start a new fight

Wiphan - the thread where this was discussed in detail is readily available. If you want to know what I think of Prosser not being charged, I suggest you go re-read the pages and pages of it where it's been previously discussed. Be sure you read the whole thing, not just the parts you want to

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Wiphan accused me of something that isn't true. Wiphan knows that. That's why he's changed the subject, and is trying to distract and start a new fight

Wiphan - the thread where this was discussed in detail is readily available. If you want to know what I think of Prosser not being charged, I suggest you go re-read the pages and pages of it where it's been previously discussed. Be sure you read the whole thing, not just the parts you want to

This isn't a court of law. He asked you a yes or no question and you didn't respond yes or no or really anyway. I mean why won't you just say yes or no?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

This isn't a court of law. He asked you a yes or no question and you didn't respond yes or no or really anyway. I mean why won't you just say yes or no?

And I asked Wiphan to answer about his accusation against me about Prosser. I referred him back to the thread where it's discussed in depth. He's ignored that and changed the subject.

You sure jumped on that change-the-subject bandwagon fast, too What's the matter, don't want to read the old thread?

Guess that speaks for itself

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

And I asked Wiphan to answer about his accusation against me about Prosser. I referred him back to the thread where it's discussed in depth. He's ignored that and changed the subject.

You sure jumped on that change-the-subject bandwagon fast, too What's the matter, don't want to read the old thread?

Guess that speaks for itself

There is very little in life that I wouldnt rather do than read that old thread. What difference does it make if he is according to you changing the subject? Is there some sort of procedures that have to be followed?

He asked you a direct question that was related to the topic you refer to. You refuse to answer. Just because this is the political section doesn't mean you have to deflect the questions like a politician does. Why wont you just say yes or no?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

He asked you a direct question that was related to the topic you refer to. You refuse to answer. Just because this is the political section doesn't mean you have to deflect the questions like a politician does. Why wont you just say yes or no?

I asked him a direct question first. Wiphan refused to answer. Why? Then he changed the subject and conned you into jumping on that changed-subject bandwagon.

Nice to know you have "rules" about "why don't you just answer" that you apply differently, depending upon who is doing the asking

Poor you. Stomp your feet and throw a fit, but you'll just have to re-read the thread, like Wiphan, if you want to rehash what's already been discussed to death about the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

On the other hand, Wiphan accused me of not admitting I said Prosser would be charged, and he was wasn't. Not true. You both refuse to look again at the thread where I said that. But I guess that's why Wiphan is so desperate to change the subject and make the attack about me. To get the emphasis off that nonsense. You're a good sheeple for Wiphan

If you both turn and attack me loudly enough, perhaps we can forget that Wiphan makes accusations that can't stand up to scrutiny? LOL

Geesh, you righties are pathetically transparent.

Now, on the other hand, "Walkergate" seems to be becoming more interesting day by day.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

I asked him a direct question first. Wiphan refused to answer. Why? Then he changed the subject and conned you into jumping on that changed-subject bandwagon.

Nice to know you have "rules" about "why don't you just answer" that you apply differently, depending upon who is doing the asking

Poor you. Stomp your feet and throw a fit, but you'll just have to re-read the thread, like Wiphan, if you want to rehash what's already been discussed to death about the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

On the other hand, Wiphan accused me of not admitting I said Prosser would be charged, and he was wasn't. Not true. You both refuse to look again at the thread where I said that. But I guess that's why Wiphan is so desperate to change the subject and make the attack about me. To get the emphasis off that nonsense. You're a good sheeple for Wiphan

If you both turn and attack me loudly enough, perhaps we can forget that Wiphan makes accusations that can't stand up to scrutiny? LOL

Geesh, you righties are pathetically transparent.

Now, on the other hand, "Walkergate" seems to be becoming more interesting day by day.

Yes or no?

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Yes or no?

Interesting I am called a righty by a so-called registered Republican. I am not registered a republican, nor will I ever be. I actually voted libertarian in the last few elections. Riot simply can not answer yes or no. She didn't answer the question in the prior thread either. She will kind of admit she is wrong and then deflect to 10 other points and explain how she was right. It is a simple question. Yes or no? Which question am I not answering? I can't find it in your ramblings and personal attacks, but again I am not as intelligent as you so I guess I am just too stupid to understand the question.

Originally Posted by This Thread about Wisconsin. Who gives a rat's d.ick?

White people who were asleep when the robberies were at a climax are now outraged that everyone is broke and cuts are being made on all levels. So since they are god-damned idiots...they continue rooting for their favorite Washington fraternity and defending their rulers at all costs.

These people make me root for the NWO as long as I and my loved ones can survive. Because even though I don't like the NWO and their agenda...there are certain parts of it I can agree with. These stupid people need to die. Anyone who isn't a cynic should be liquified and used for clean energy in the new Utopia. That, at the very least, should be the final nail in the coffin for Arby's commercials, Craigslist m4m casual encounters, and flash mobs.