WI Governor Walker top aid under FBI investigation

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Really? Which issue was that? Disagreeing with your politics? That's sort of the #1 cry of conservatives: when the facts show your governor to be a liar, dig in your heels and accuse the other side of "being wrong" and "refusing to admit they are wrong" - LOL

I dare you to talk only about politics here, and stop being nasty, insulting, personal. You can't do it, either.

The fact that you could not admit that you were wrong about justice prosser. You could not just admit that you were wrong. You had to continually attack him and find excuses on why he was not charged. You just couldn't admit that you were wrong. Plain and simple. There was nothing to the charges from day 1. You still believe in your mind that he is evil and should have been charged with a crime; however you are probably the only one on the planet that actually believes this. You might earn a little more respect around here by just admitting when your wrong or when Obama or the democrats are wrong. It is kind of similar to Nancy Pelosi's arguement about how unemployment benefits create jobs.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

The fact that you could not admit that you were wrong about justice prosser.

LOL - wrong. Excuse me, but I posted right up front in that thread, acknowledging that the Prosser result wasn't what I hoped for.

Nice try. But not true.

You still believe in your mind that he is evil and should have been charged with a crime; however you are probably the only one on the planet that actually believes this.

LOL - yes, I do, and no, I'm not the only one: the internal ethics charges with the law board are still pending. And it's pretty obvious the guy was involved in a physical altercation with another judge. And with a cameraman. And has a documented history of outbursts on the court.

If you think I'll ever post that Prosser is a man completely innocent of workplace violence, I'll never do that, because it would be an outright lie disproven by the facts.

You might earn more respect around here by not completely ignoring such things.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - wrong. Excuse me, but I posted right up front in that thread, acknowledging that the Prosser result wasn't what I hoped for.

Nice try. But not true.



LOL - yes, I do, and no, I'm not the only one: the internal ethics charges with the law board are still pending. And it's pretty obvious the guy was involved in a physical altercation with another judge. And with a cameraman. And has a documented history of outbursts on the court.

If you think I'll ever post that Prosser is a man completely innocent of workplace violence, I'll never do that, because it would be an outright lie disproven by the facts.

You might earn more respect around here by not completely ignoring such things.

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things. You just can't do it. If you had your way you would give the guy life in prison yet not only is he not guilty, but he was never even charged.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Again stating that the outcome wasn't what you hoped for and admitting you were wrong are 2 very different things.

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

You didn't read the entire thread, I must assume?

Go away until you at least have some of the intellectual honesty you want in others.

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Wow. I post facts and you attack. I get it now. Carry on...

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that he is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer