Goodbye Weiner

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

As I said before, agreeing with you, it doesn't compare, Weiner to Vitter, Ensign that is. Weiner should not have resigned but had some balls and stood up to his own party. Heck even the hardcore dem DTer's turned on him.

However I still consider lying under oath far more serious than visiting a prostitute. Clinton to Vitter, Ensign.

BTW At least John Edwards' wife RIP had enough pride and self-worth to leave him, something the rest of the DC wives seemingly lack.

Never put yourself in the position of judging a wife's actions in matters such as this...everyone is different as is every marriage. It was Hillary's choice and she made it, she deserves respect for going through the public pain not cheap shots from a Democrat hater such as yourself! Pray you never find yourself in such a position and keep your hate-filled mouth shut about matters you can't possibly understand!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Never put yourself in the position of judging a wife's actions in matters such as this...everyone is different as is every marriage. It was Hillary's choice and she made it, she deserves respect for going through the public pain not cheap shots from a Democrat hater such as yourself! Pray you never find yourself in such a position and keep your hate-filled mouth shut about matters you can't possibly understand!

Give me a break Hillary said she was not a 'stand by your man' kind of woman. Bashed the poor victims of her husband and then showed it was all BS as she proved to be the woman she was accusing them (Paula Jones & Co) of being.

BTW I'll post what I want just as your broke a$$ will.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Give me a break Hillary said she was not a 'stand by your man' kind of woman. Bashed the poor victims of her husband and then showed it was all BS as she proved to be the woman she was accusing them (Paula Jones & Co) of being.

BTW I'll post what I want just as your broke a$$ will.

Again, you are posting about something you have no idea about...only Hillary knows why she decided as she did. Your pathetic hatred of all things liberal is manifested almost daily by your postings from mostly right-wing web sites of anything anti liberal/Democratic, that's fine....everyone understands your obsession but don't pretend to be a mind reader and publicly take cheap shots at folks making private decisions.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Again, you are posting about something you have no idea about...only Hillary knows why she decided as she did. Your pathetic hatred of all things liberal is manifested almost daily by your postings from mostly right-wing web sites of anything anti liberal/Democratic, that's fine....everyone understands your obsession but don't pretend to be a mind reader and publicly take cheap shots at folks making private decisions.

It's part of a strong Libertarian viewpoint, to be completely intolerant of, and overly concerned with, the independence and differences inherent within other people ...

... or not Libertarian in the least.

BTW, "liberals" and "libertarians" have alot in common.

Libertarian Platform 2010

As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others.

We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

Consequently, we defend each person's right to engage in any activity that is peaceful and honest, and welcome the diversity that freedom brings. The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

It's part of a strong Libertarian viewpoint, to be completely intolerant of, and overly concerned with, the independence and differences inherent within other people ...

... or not Libertarian in the least.

BTW, "liberals" and "libertarians" have alot in common.

With independence there is no need for tolerence. It would be inherented. Everyone would be independent and equal. What America is supposed to be.

Somer and ur bad knee be damned.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

With independence there is no need for tolerence. It would be inherented. Everyone would be independent and equal. What America is supposed to be.

Somer and ur bad knee be damned.

Independence by no means guarantees tolerance, they are completely separate concepts...just because one is "free" does not mean he/she is tolerant of the rights of others.

I am intolerant of the direction of this thread. I need government intervention to prevent me from calling you a stupid f.uck.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Independence by no means guarantees tolerance, they are completely separate concepts...just because one is "free" does not mean he/she is tolerant of the rights of others.

And pointing out hypocrisy, as in the case with 'I'm not a stand by your man' Hillary Clinton does not make one intolerant. Neither does not wanting to support you and subsidizing insurance policies.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

With independence there is no need for tolerence. It would be inherented. Everyone would be independent and equal. What America is supposed to be.

Somer and ur bad knee be damned.

There's just this mishmosh of words flowing around crazy inside your head, isn't there?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

There's just this mishmosh of words flowing around crazy inside your head, isn't there?

Not really, just a bit of common sense.

Like understanding spending will never ever get one out of bankruptcy.