Goodbye Weiner
 

We hardly knew you. Sad that you couldn't resign immediately and chose to lie.

Noooooo we need you. ;)

As I said before what you did compared to what Bill Clinton did is like a fart compared to shiating your pants. Grow some Hillary balls and stand up to these hypocrites, your supposed friends!

Best for all involved, one less freak in the Washington sideshow.

I'll bet he runs in the special election for his district, and wins.

:tro::eek::D

Agreed.

How is it compared to you thoughts on Senator Vitter? Or Senator Ensign?

Not justifying what Weiner did - it was the blatant, repetitive lying that was so disturbing to me - but comparing a non-law-breaking sexual scandal to lawbreaking sexual scandals for the hypocrisy factor is sometimes a good reflective thing.

yep, only 500 plus to go

That would be fine, but he needs some punishment for the week-long video -taped lie festival.

It was over when he lost Ginger Lee . . .

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../06/029255.php

I said all along Weiner should have stayed. It wasn't Repubs that drove him out of office but Dems like Pelosi, and Schultz, the same who had Clinton's back.

BTW Clinton lied under oath and that is what sets him apart.

Trying to blame Reps for Weiner leaving is almost as bad as you blaming the House Leader for not calling out Obama after 15 days in Lybia ignoring the fact that Obama's main arguement is we are fighting under the NATO flag so it doesn't count. That is far more alarming to me than Clinton lying about a BJ but fully expected. Just like him sending the Paki's big money while declining Jasper MO residents. His love of all things Muslim comes out loud and clear. :zz:

That is a nice soliloquy, going off in your usual crazy tangents and untrue assumptions about other posters, but the question you were trying to answer was:

"How is it compared to you thoughts on Senator Vitter? Or Senator Ensign?" How do you feel comparing law-breaking to non-law breaking "scandals".

As I said before, agreeing with you, it doesn't compare, Weiner to Vitter, Ensign that is. Weiner should not have resigned but had some balls and stood up to his own party. Heck even the hardcore dem DTer's turned on him.

However I still consider lying under oath far more serious than visiting a prostitute. Clinton to Vitter, Ensign.

BTW At least John Edwards' wife RIP had enough pride and self-worth to leave him, something the rest of the DC wives seemingly lack.

Never put yourself in the position of judging a wife's actions in matters such as this...everyone is different as is every marriage. It was Hillary's choice and she made it, she deserves respect for going through the public pain not cheap shots from a Democrat hater such as yourself! Pray you never find yourself in such a position and keep your hate-filled mouth shut about matters you can't possibly understand!

Give me a break Hillary said she was not a 'stand by your man' kind of woman. Bashed the poor victims of her husband and then showed it was all BS as she proved to be the woman she was accusing them (Paula Jones & Co) of being.

BTW I'll post what I want just as your broke a$$ will.

Again, you are posting about something you have no idea about...only Hillary knows why she decided as she did. Your pathetic hatred of all things liberal is manifested almost daily by your postings from mostly right-wing web sites of anything anti liberal/Democratic, that's fine....everyone understands your obsession but don't pretend to be a mind reader and publicly take cheap shots at folks making private decisions.

It's part of a strong Libertarian viewpoint, to be completely intolerant of, and overly concerned with, the independence and differences inherent within other people ...

... or not Libertarian in the least.

BTW, "liberals" and "libertarians" have alot in common.

With independence there is no need for tolerence. It would be inherented. Everyone would be independent and equal. What America is supposed to be.

Somer and ur bad knee be damned.:p

Independence by no means guarantees tolerance, they are completely separate concepts...just because one is "free" does not mean he/she is tolerant of the rights of others.