New York Magazine in-depth article on Roger Ailes

[lord007]

Originally Posted by GBBob

But politics aside, why wouldn't you find an in-depth article on the history of Fox News interesting? I think the behind the scenes stuff is fascinating

It's the source my friend

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by lord007

It's the source my friend

I had a feeling that's where you were going. Look...she is no more annoying that many/most of the righties here...it just depends on your perspective I think. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For what it's worth..and I know you said you give two sh.its about Beck, but I think it's pretty ironic when the Right complains about ANY over the top poster who dares to challenge them. There is so much Kool Aid drinking done by Conservatives that a vocal opposition just automatically becomes an auto-toss..like..How DARE you disagree with me..

Just sayin'..

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by lord007

It's the source my friend

did you know ruprert murdoch owned the magazine for about 10 years in the 80's?

i know it has "new york" in the title but that really isn't synonymous with "liberal" in all cases. think william f. buckley for example.

and if you really want anyone to believe you actually read an article, try posting something more than two words as a review followed by insightful criticism specifying that the source is the real problem.

[lord007]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

did you know ruprert murdoch owned the magazine for about 10 years in the 80's?

i know it has "new york" in the title but that really isn't synonymous with "liberal" in all cases. think william f. buckley for example.

and if you really want anyone to believe you actually read an article, try posting something more than two words as a review followed by insightful criticism specifying that the source is the real problem.

All about $$$....all you need to know...wait..your GOD

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by lord007

All about $$$....all you need to know...wait..your GOD

i never intended it to work this way but the username has turned out to be an infallible newbie filter. they always bring it up.

not that being a newbie makes your opinion any less valued. it's actually the lack of content behind the opinion that accomplishes that.

[lord007]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i never intended it to work this way but the username has turned out to be an infallible newbie filter. they always bring it up.

not that being a newbie makes your opinion any less valued. it's actually the lack of content behind the opinion that accomplishes that.

Useless... .... ....

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by lord007

Useless... .... ....

obvious...

[Danzig]

wait....somone using the name lord is upset about someone else being god? now, that's interesting.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

did you know ruprert murdoch owned the magazine for about 10 years in the 80's?

i know it has "new york" in the title but that really isn't synonymous with "liberal" in all cases. think william f. buckley for example.

and if you really want anyone to believe you actually read an article, try posting something more than two words as a review followed by insightful criticism specifying that the source is the real problem.

I wish William F. Buckley was still around. WFB Junior has become marginalized by his appallment at the current conservative movement.

Edit: I miss Firing Line. And Buckley's fight with Gore Vidal was classic.
Went looking, found this article by Christopher:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...ase-for-obama/

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by Riot

I wish William F. Buckley was still around. WFB Junior has become marginalized by his appallment at the current conservative movement.

shhhh...

lord007 is trying to read. it's seven whole pages.

[Riot]

If you didn't notice, here's another great click-through on the first page of the NYM article on Ailes:

http://nymag.com/news/media/david-br...atters-2011-5/

Another multi-pager in-depth:

If I Take Down Fox, Is All Forgiven?

David Brock has spent the last decade apologizing to liberals for his role in creating the vast right-wing conspiracy. Now he’s trying something more ambitious and hoping it gains him the respect he craves from the White House.


There may be no greater testament to *David Brock’s central role in the vast left-wing conspiracy than the lengths to which Rupert Murdoch will go to avoid him.

In November, a researcher at Media Matters for America, the liberal press-watchdog group that Brock founded seven years ago, noticed that the website *Charitybuzz was auctioning a “friendly lunch” with Murdoch to benefit the Global Poverty Project. That one of Brock’s worker bees would be keeping tabs on the News Corp. chairman’s calendar should not be terribly surprising. At Media Matters’ headquarters in Washington, D.C., scores of headphone-wearing staffers spend their days (and nights) staring into their television screens and computer monitors, waiting for the latest bits of “conservative misinformation” to emerge from the Fox News Channel and other corners of the right-wing media landscape, all of which are saved on “the big TiVo”—270 terabytes’ worth of hard drive that store over 300,000 hours of TV shows—so that the offending clips can be uploaded to Media Matters’ website. Are you in need of a compendium of the “50 Worst Things Glenn Beck Said on Fox News”? Fear not, Media Matters’ site has one.