Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:14 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

There is a question which will ultimately be asked of KHRA that they will never be able to answer well. Why was Dutrow licensed in 2010? What are they going to say? We only license trainers with up to 57 violations not 60? And once they admit that the reason is new violations then the cat is out of the bag on procedure and precedent.. How much money are they going to waste defending their position when they have virtually no chance of suceeding..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:31 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
There is a question which will ultimately be asked of KHRA that they will never be able to answer well. Why was Dutrow licensed in 2010? What are they going to say? We only license trainers with up to 57 violations not 60? And once they admit that the reason is new violations then the cat is out of the bag on procedure and precedent.. How much money are they going to waste defending their position when they have virtually no chance of suceeding..
Are you kidding? Dutrow's inability to fill out an application properly despite being given fair warning that he was having a hearing makes for a tough argument.

As far as I have ever heard in these cases the states are undefeated. It is their license, they make the rules and they can interpret them as they want. The only people wasting money will be Dutrow's lawyers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:47 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Are you kidding? Dutrow's inability to fill out an application properly despite being given fair warning that he was having a hearing makes for a tough argument.

As far as I have ever heard in these cases the states are undefeated. It is their license, they make the rules and they can interpret them as they want. The only people wasting money will be Dutrow's lawyers.
Apparently today's results notwithstanding..lol

Chuck Dutrow maybe the biggest cheat ever and frankly I could careless if he trains ever again, but at least admit its a witch hunt.. The guy had 50 mil positives in 2010, now lo and behold a few more broke the camels back? Have a heart its a capricious attack.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:48 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Apparently today's results notwithstanding..lol

Chuck Dutrow maybe the biggest cheat ever and frankly I could careless if he trains ever again, but at least admit its a witch hunt.. The guy had 50 mil positives in 2010, now lo and behold a few more broke the camels back? Have a heart its a capricious attack.
Who the hell is Chuck Dutrow
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 04:19 PM
Merlinsky Merlinsky is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62 View Post
Who the hell is Chuck Dutrow
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0244853/
The production designer of Indecent Behavior III.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 05:43 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Apparently today's results notwithstanding..lol

Chuck Dutrow maybe the biggest cheat ever and frankly I could careless if he trains ever again, but at least admit its a witch hunt.. The guy had 50 mil positives in 2010, now lo and behold a few more broke the camels back? Have a heart its a capricious attack.
Witch hunts are conducted on people who aren't witches. Dutrow is a witch. He may not be the queen witch but a witch nonetheless. And even witches can conduct their business in a proper manner. Because he and others have skated for years doesn't mean it is right and doesn't mean it should continue.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2011, 06:54 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Witch hunts are conducted on people who aren't witches. Dutrow is a witch. He may not be the queen witch but a witch nonetheless. And even witches can conduct their business in a proper manner. Because he and others have skated for years doesn't mean it is right and doesn't mean it should continue.
So basically you are suggesting that indeed Dutrow has not changed his spots and hence what has changed is the state and their licensing practices..If so then such change should be on record and be consisent for all.. Are you attempting to suggest that only Dutrow has had a new positive(or multiples) and is the ONLY person that has issues? Or are you says the state can simply use the best interest in racing clause without due process?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 06:58 PM
Alan07 Alan07 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,714
Default

Court Vision will be permitted to run tomorrow under the name of a new trainer, Justin Sallusto.
http://www.drf.com/news/keeneland-co...-trainers-name
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:30 PM
Dahoss Dahoss is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan07 View Post
Court Vision will be permitted to run tomorrow under the name of a new trainer, Justin Sallusto.
http://www.drf.com/news/keeneland-co...-trainers-name
Allowing this defeats the whole purpose of denying him a license.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:26 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
So basically you are suggesting that indeed Dutrow has not changed his spots and hence what has changed is the state and their licensing practices..If so then such change should be on record and be consisent for all.. Are you attempting to suggest that only Dutrow has had a new positive(or multiples) and is the ONLY person that has issues? Or are you says the state can simply use the best interest in racing clause without due process?
There is no due process. There is no crime or charges. He is simply denied a license to train in the state. It is a professional license. Obviously they feel he no longer qualifies for a license in KY. He is not suspended or banned. He simply is not licensed. It isn't as though he hasn't given them ample evidence to use against him.

Do you think that Dutrow is the ONLY one who has been refused a license in KY? Did you miss the post about Hebert and Torres?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.