Handle Decline Continues...

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

Not going to debate the issue with you. You lost me at "...around almost as long as the game" nonsense. If you really believe cheating today is similar to what it was even 15 years ago, we are not going to have a legitimate discussion.

As far as the economy goes, I think you're the one with the government job. Make yourself more valuable and you'll earn more money, despite the market. Gambling almost always works independent of economic times. Sure, there might be moderate fluctuations but, the reality is, most gamblers will find the money to wager. They may not find the money to replace the moth eaten sweaters or toeless sneakers but they will find money to bet.

You cannot convince me that the casino industry is showing a decline. If economy was the issue, all gambling would be off. It's not.

I assure you that I don't have a government job and that I do quite well, in fact even in this bad environment this will easily be my best year yet, but I guess you weren't able to get my point in the first place. If you think drugging is a new thing than you are really lost, but you tipped that off as well by admitting that you got lost at that point. There was cheating going on 30, 40 years ago, even longer. In fact, there may have been more then as there was little to no detection methods back then.

I am tired of the doom and gloom from people like you. Horseracing will get through the bad economy, the trainers that give their horses illicit drugs and will be around for a long time. The real problem is the competition it has had from other sports gaining popularity and taking TV time, competition from the casinos for the gambling dollar which are popping up everywhere and the watered down product caused by trainers keeping their horses in the barns instread of running them creating much smaller fields. Then there is a reason that explains a large portion of the decline, the fact that the largest bet taker in the country of Thoroghbred racing was in business March of last year and is out of business March of this year. It is going to take some time to recover all of those lost players. While the cheating contributes to it, it is not the major factor for recent declines as you unwittingly claim.

The casino industry thought it was economy proof until the last few years. They have had declines in the last two to three years despite the fact that States have legalized gambling allowing it in places never before which should have increased the revenue. That said, most casinos are still seeing declines and the ones that aren't are barely gaining if at all. But go ahead, keep telling everyone the sport is going into the s.hit.ter.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

If you really believe cheating today is similar to what it was even 15 years ago, we are not going to have a legitimate discussion.

LOl How exactly do you measure this?

[Split Rock]

Originally Posted by pointman

I assure you that I don't have a government job and that I do quite well, in fact even in this bad environment this will easily be my best year yet, but I guess you weren't able to get my point in the first place. If you think drugging is a new thing than you are really lost, but you tipped that off as well by admitting that you got lost at that point. There was cheating going on 30, 40 years ago, even longer. In fact, there may have been more then as there was little to no detection methods back then.

I am tired of the doom and gloom from people like you. Horseracing will get through the bad economy, the trainers that give their horses illicit drugs and will be around for a long time. The real problem is the competition it has had from other sports gaining popularity and taking TV time, competition from the casinos for the gambling dollar which are popping up everywhere and the watered down product caused by trainers keeping their horses in the barns instread of running them creating much smaller fields. Then there is a reason that explains a large portion of the decline, the fact that the largest bet taker in the country of Thoroghbred racing was in business March of last year and is out of business March of this year. It is going to take some time to recover all of those lost players. While the cheating contributes to it, it is not the major factor for recent declines as you unwittingly claim.

The casino industry thought it was economy proof until the last few years. They have had declines in the last two to three years despite the fact that States have legalized gambling allowing it in places never before which should have increased the revenue. That said, most casinos are still seeing declines and the ones that aren't are barely gaining if at all. But go ahead, keep telling everyone the sport is going into the s.hit.ter.

"....the sport is going into the s.hit.ter" To think it's not is absurd. It is not people like me and all my doom and gloom that is the problem. It is people that make excuses for those that cause it to be all doom and gloom. I've followed horse racing since 1986. I can tell you the game has never been as blatantly corrupt as it is now. You can choose to think it isn't or choose to think that doesn't affect the state is in now. I choose to believe it does. If it isn't the main reason for the start of the decline of horse racing, it certainly has contributed to it.

I'm sure many that read my posts will think I just have an axe to grind about the drug issue. Well, whenever I look at PP's and see guys winning with broken animals and instead of going to prison where they belong for committing a felonious act of tampering with a pari-mutual wagering event, they are praised, it sickens me.

The game is on the decline. Unfortunately, I cannot do a damn thing to stop it short of taking symbolic stance.

[Split Rock]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

LOl How exactly do you measure this?

Why do I need to measure it?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

Why do I need to measure it?

How do you know that "cheating" is much worse without some sort of measure?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

I'm sure many that read my posts will think I just have an axe to grind about the drug issue. Well, whenever I look at PP's and see guys winning with broken animals and instead of going to prison where they belong for committing a felonious act of tampering with a pari-mutual wagering event, they are praised, it sickens me.
.

You can tell from pp's that guys are winning with "broken animals"? You do know the b in PP's is blinkers not broken right?

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

"....the sport is going into the s.hit.ter" To think it's not is absurd. It is not people like me and all my doom and gloom that is the problem. It is people that make excuses for those that cause it to be all doom and gloom. I've followed horse racing since 1986. I can tell you the game has never been as blatantly corrupt as it is now. You can choose to think it isn't or choose to think that doesn't affect the state is in now. I choose to believe it does. If it isn't the main reason for the start of the decline of horse racing, it certainly has contributed to it.

I'm sure many that read my posts will think I just have an axe to grind about the drug issue. Well, whenever I look at PP's and see guys winning with broken animals and instead of going to prison where they belong for committing a felonious act of tampering with a pari-mutual wagering event, they are praised, it sickens me.

The game is on the decline. Unfortunately, I cannot do a damn thing to stop it short of taking symbolic stance.

You are laughable. Nice attempt to take what I said out of context in a futile attempt to save face. No one condones the cheating and drugging, but it has to be taken in context, particularly with regard to the issue of the decline in handle. You stated matter of factly that the real reason for the decline in handle is the cheating by trainers. This is simply not true, it is merely a factor amongst many other factors of which many of the others are the main reason for the decline in handle from this time last year to this time this year which is what the drf article was about.

Once again, you continue to insist that cheating is a new thing which is simply wrong. Drugging horses has gone back a long time and was done and known to the public well before decline in handle. In fact, race fixing in addition to drugging was a much larger problem years ago than it is today. It amazes me that people spout out nonsense and then continue to insist they are right while attempting to belittle those who correct them. If you have been following horse racing since 1986 you obviously haven't learned much. There was plenty of drugging going on then and this suggestion that it started sometime in the mid 1990's and drove big gamblers away is absurd.

Cheating is simply part of human nature and will occur anywhere humans are involved. It is not just horseracing that has cheaters using drugs to gain an advantage, but baseball, football, hockey, cycling, Olympic sports, you name it. Why isn't the cheating driving fans away from those sports?

Instead of posting before thinking you might try the opposite, you just might post something worth reading. Stop being a fan of horseracing, thank god Zenyatta has brought many new fans to the sport, it can afford to lose one!

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You can tell from pp's that guys are winning with "broken animals"? You do know the b in PP's is blinkers not broken right?

LOL, please the nonsense he is tossing out is never ending, you could go on all day attempting to get any factual basis to support the crap he is throwing out. You would think he would quit before he gets further behind.

[cakes44]

I make 5 figs. I suck.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by cakes44

I make 5 figs. I suck.

If its d.ick you are sucking you are doing better than most in the private sector in this economy!

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by pointman

If its d.ick you are sucking you are doing better than most in the private sector in this economy!

Good guess...and thank you very much. That makes me feel much better now.

[Cannon Shell]

You want to know whats wrong with this game? The product distributed on TV is not only morbid but the companies in charge of showing the races (TVG/HRTV) do a terrible job of simply showing the races. Today you have 4 TB tracks running currently. TVG shows the 1st 4 from Parx which is the only track running early. So they send a lot of time covering those races. However at 2 pm they stop showing Parx races altogether and cover Will Rogers Downs and Fairmont Park with Hawthorne coming at 2:30. So now they can't cover 4 tracks despite Parx's post being in between the other 3 tracks which are now going off within 3 minutes of each other.

Would it be that hard to get these 4 sad sack tracks to coordinate posts by adding a few minutes here and there and show ALL the races live?

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You want to know whats wrong with this game? The product distributed on TV is not only morbid but the companies in charge of showing the races (TVG/HRTV) do a terrible job of simply showing the races. Today you have 4 TB tracks running currently. TVG shows the 1st 4 from Parx which is the only track running early. So they send a lot of time covering those races. However at 2 pm they stop showing Parx races altogether and cover Will Rogers Downs and Fairmont Park with Hawthorne coming at 2:30. So now they can't cover 4 tracks despite Parx's post being in between the other 3 tracks which are now going off within 3 minutes of each other.

Would it be that hard to get these 4 sad sack tracks to coordinate posts by adding a few minutes here and there and show ALL the races live?

Every race should be broadcast on the internet for free from every track. Instead, you have to flop around to even watch races.

[Split Rock]

Originally Posted by pointman

You are laughable. Nice attempt to take what I said out of context in a futile attempt to save face. No one condones the cheating and drugging, but it has to be taken in context, particularly with regard to the issue of the decline in handle. You stated matter of factly that the real reason for the decline in handle is the cheating by trainers. This is simply not true, it is merely a factor amongst many other factors of which many of the others are the main reason for the decline in handle from this time last year to this time this year which is what the drf article was about.

Once again, you continue to insist that cheating is a new thing which is simply wrong. Drugging horses has gone back a long time and was done and known to the public well before decline in handle. In fact, race fixing in addition to drugging was a much larger problem years ago than it is today. It amazes me that people spout out nonsense and then continue to insist they are right while attempting to belittle those who correct them. If you have been following horse racing since 1986 you obviously haven't learned much. There was plenty of drugging going on then and this suggestion that it started sometime in the mid 1990's and drove big gamblers away is absurd.

Cheating is simply part of human nature and will occur anywhere humans are involved. It is not just horseracing that has cheaters using drugs to gain an advantage, but baseball, football, hockey, cycling, Olympic sports, you name it. Why isn't the cheating driving fans away from those sports?

Instead of posting before thinking you might try the opposite, you just might post something worth reading. Stop being a fan of horseracing, thank god Zenyatta has brought many new fans to the sport, it can afford to lose one!

What's laughable is someone taking offense to this. Are you kidding me?

You mentioned the other sports where cheating occurs....baseball (cleaned it up and is prosecuting those that took steriods and humiliating those "great" players like Clemens and McGuire by not allowing them in the Hall of Fame. That is how a real industry handles those that taint the sport). Football, hockey have done similar. Cycling?!?? Are you joking? The drug issue in that sport is destroying it. They can't get a good handle on it and it is killing the sport. Olympics....very similar to cycling.

I understand that cheating has been in the sport forever. But cheating today is completely different and much, much, much more rampant.

There's really no point in you and I debating it. I believe the horse players should try and stand up to this in whatever way they can. You believe horse players should excuse it so you can keep playing the game. The current drug situation in the sport came on the scene in the mid to late 1990's. Same time as baseball and all the other sports.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Split Rock

What's laughable is someone taking offense to this. Are you kidding me?

You mentioned the other sports where cheating occurs....baseball (cleaned it up and is prosecuting those that took steriods and humiliating those "great" players like Clemens and McGuire by not allowing them in the Hall of Fame. That is how a real industry handles those that taint the sport). Football, hockey have done similar. Cycling?!?? Are you joking? The drug issue in that sport is destroying it. They can't get a good handle on it and it is killing the sport. Olympics....very similar to cycling.

I understand that cheating has been in the sport forever. But cheating today is completely different and much, much, much more rampant.

There's really no point in you and I debating it. I believe the horse players should try and stand up to this in whatever way they can. You believe horse players should excuse it so you can keep playing the game. The current drug situation in the sport came on the scene in the mid to late 1990's. Same time as baseball and all the other sports.

You are simply speculating and have no real clue of what you are talking about. The idea that there is more "cheating" now than 30 years ago is laughable. The difference is that there is a whole lot more info available. 30 years ago you would have never heard of guys you have named in this thread because there was no simulcasting and for the most part people followed one circuit and no one paid any attention to anyones win percentage. Stop trying to pass off your opinion as fact especially when your entire defense is baseball players or cyclists.

[Split Rock]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You are simply speculating and have no real clue of what you are talking about. The idea that there is more "cheating" now than 30 years ago is laughable. The difference is that there is a whole lot more info available. 30 years ago you would have never heard of guys you have named in this thread because there was no simulcasting and for the most part people followed one circuit and no one paid any attention to anyones win percentage. Stop trying to pass off your opinion as fact especially when your entire defense is baseball players or cyclists.

I speak english

[PatCummings]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You want to know whats wrong with this game? The product distributed on TV is not only morbid but the companies in charge of showing the races (TVG/HRTV) do a terrible job of simply showing the races. Today you have 4 TB tracks running currently. TVG shows the 1st 4 from Parx which is the only track running early. So they send a lot of time covering those races. However at 2 pm they stop showing Parx races altogether and cover Will Rogers Downs and Fairmont Park with Hawthorne coming at 2:30. So now they can't cover 4 tracks despite Parx's post being in between the other 3 tracks which are now going off within 3 minutes of each other.

Would it be that hard to get these 4 sad sack tracks to coordinate posts by adding a few minutes here and there and show ALL the races live?

To make it worse, it's the WAY some of these networks try to cover races. Old Phonebet TV in the Philly area would show four or five tracks at a time, giving you three slates of odds and exactas at the same time, set up the race, price every one out. It was hardcore and without a ton of chatter. No real studio, no personalities per se, just racing, info, and some guidance from the host going from track to track. Still haven't seen any others measure up to them.

And if they were more than ten minutes behind with tape delays, that was a bad day...

Of course, I am biased, as I used to work there...

[3kings]

Originally Posted by PatCummings

To make it worse, it's the WAY some of these networks try to cover races. Old Phonebet TV in the Philly area would show four or five tracks at a time, giving you three slates of odds and exactas at the same time, set up the race, price every one out. It was hardcore and without a ton of chatter. No real studio, no personalities per se, just racing, info, and some guidance from the host going from track to track. Still haven't seen any others measure up to them.

And if they were more than ten minutes behind with tape delays, that was a bad day...

Of course, I am biased, as I used to work there...

I remember this. It had track info from up to four tracks when needed, but when the race ran it was shown across the whole screen. No filler and no bad opinions. The background music was awful.

[Port Conway Lane]

I don't get it. What is the difference between Phonebet and any other ADW showing streaming video?

This past Sunday HRTV neglected a number of early races at SA so my only option was to watch it online. No big deal. Once GP ended back to normal.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane

I don't get it. What is the difference between Phonebet and any other ADW showing streaming video?

This past Sunday HRTV neglected a number of early races at SA so my only option was to watch it online. No big deal. Once GP ended back to normal.

It was available on television?