Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: Should Medicare be eliminated?
Yes, Medicare should be eliminated. The elderly should provide their own health care. 2 8.33%
Yes, Medicare should be eliminated, but privatized and largely subsidized by the government 2 8.33%
Yes, Medicare should be eliminated, but privatized and barely subsidized by the government. 2 8.33%
No, Medicare should stay as it is now, continue lowering costs, bargaining for drug deals, etc. 10 41.67%
No, Medicare should be expanded, everyone can buy in, single payer health ins. for all. 8 33.33%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old 04-04-2011, 08:17 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
Not really. The history of gov't provided health care is long and winding. The SSA website has a good summary. Here's the page on the post-WW2 period through the Truman years, which is when discussion of a national health care system was at its height:

http://www.ssa.gov/history/corningchap3.html

Highlights:

<In sum, the Wagner-Murray-Dingell bill was the victim of a cautious Congress, massive resistance by a prestigious and vitally affected interest group, sympathy for the AMA's position from an imposing array of nonmedical groups, a lack of wholehearted support from some of the key proponents, considerable antipathy from the press, the rapid growth of private insurance, and, finally, of a hostile political climate.>

And:
<Years later, President Truman wrote: "I have had some bitter disappointments as President, but the one that has troubled me most, in a personal way, has been the failure to defeat the organized opposition to a National compulsory health insurance program. But this opposition has only delayed and cannot stop the adoption of an indispensable Federal health insurance plan.">

(Oh, Harry; you were such an optimist)

It's easy to credit our Presidents with dictatorial powers (and Shrub and Darth Cheney sure gave a good go at it), but laws are not written by Presidents; they're written by Congress. A President can push for an agenda (and Johnson was a bully and rammed a lot through, no question) but they don't govern by fiat.
Eh?

Quote:
With the election of Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964, Democrats controlled both the Presidency and the Congress, claiming a 2:1 ratio to Republicans in the House and 32 more seats in the Senate. The Democrats in the House Ways and Means Committee shifted away from Southern Democrats, making the committee more sympathetic towards health insurance reform.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.