NPR you suck

Riot · #1 10-25-2010, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Completely flummoxed now.

Yes. I'm completely flummoxed by your awesome debate skills. I gave up when you said,

Quote:

The fact is that everyone of us knows that if a suspect looking person wearing muslim clothing gets on a plane with us, the thought crosses our minds. You may not admit it but you know it is true.

Yes, everything thinks like you do. You know how everyone else thinks. If others say they do not think like you, you say they are denying.

Little superior of you, don't you think?

Cannon Shell · #2 10-25-2010, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Yes. I'm completely flummoxed by your awesome debate skills.

Well with an assist from Rupert I have debated you into one word posts and have you refusing to answer questions. I'd say that this would be considered a victory of sorts.

Riot · #3 10-25-2010, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Well with an assist from Rupert I have debated you into one word posts and have you refusing to answer questions. I'd say that this would be considered a victory of sorts.

Well, when confronted with so much stupid, I just give up

Cannon Shell · #4 10-25-2010, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, when confronted with so much stupid, I just give up

Even the russian judge gave us a 9.6 after you started hurling the insults

Riot · #5 10-25-2010, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Even the russian judge gave us a 9.6 after you started hurling the insults

Look out! A person in Muslim clothing!

Cannon Shell · #6 10-25-2010, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Look out! A person in Muslim clothing!

good one...

SCUDSBROTHER · #7 10-25-2010, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, when confronted with so much stupid, I just give up

Doubt it

Riot · #8 10-25-2010, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Doubt it

Even I laughed

Cannon Shell · #9 10-25-2010, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Doubt it

I just can't believe that the Giants got so far without Eugenio...

SCUDSBROTHER · #10 10-25-2010, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I just can't believe that the Giants got so far without Eugenio...

He was there..LOL...

SCUDSBROTHER · #11 10-25-2010, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I just can't believe that the Giants got so far without Eugenio...

Each time someone says something (good or bad) about him, he'll likely do the opposite of whatever they're saying will happen. He's as inconsistent as it gets.

Antitrust32 · #12 10-25-2010, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Well with an assist from Rupert I have debated you into one word posts and have you refusing to answer questions. I'd say that this would be considered a victory of sorts.

She deflects ALL questions. Just check out 1,000 different threads that she's involved in. This is common knowledge by now.

SCUDSBROTHER · #13 10-25-2010, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

She deflects ALL questions. Just check out 1,000 different threads that she's involved in. This is common knowledge by now.

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/...YouTube+Legacy

Just like that.

Rupert Pupkin · #14 10-25-2010, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

She deflects ALL questions. Just check out 1,000 different threads that she's involved in. This is common knowledge by now.

And she doesn't understand why people give her a hard time. It's not because of her views. It's because of her dishonesty about her own views. When confronted with an inconsistency in one of her proclaimed views, she simply resfuses to answer the question.

Riot · #15 10-25-2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

And she doesn't understand why people give her a hard time. It's not because of her views. It's because of her dishonesty about her own views. When confronted with an inconsistency in one of her proclaimed views, she simply resfuses to answer the question.

What a load of crap. You guys routinely make absurd straw men up out of thin air, create false assumptions about what other people think or say about it, then diss them for it

Yeah, you guys are the rocket scientists of debate skills

Rupert Pupkin · #16 10-25-2010, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Yes. I'm completely flummoxed by your awesome debate skills. I gave up when you said,

Yes, everything thinks like you do. You know how everyone else thinks. If others say they do not think like you, you say they are denying.

Little superior of you, don't you think?

You obviously are "completely flummoxed by our debate skills" and that is why you refused to answer my question.

You're not kidding anyone on this board. Every single person on this board knows that you are full of crap. That is why we all give you a hard time. We don't give you a hard time because of your views. I don't have a problem with the other liberals on this board. At least I can have a discussion with them. If I ask them a question, they will give me an honest answer, unlike you. You refuse to answer any question that will hurt your argument.

The reason you refused to answer the question was obvious. The question was going to expose you for the fraud that you are.

Any person with a brain knows that the vast majority of violent crime is committed by males rather than females. And anybody with half a brain knows that most violent crimes are committed by young people rather than by an 80 year old person. So the least likely person to be mugged by would be an old lady. The most likely person to be mugged by would be a young man.

That is why anyone with a brain would be more fearful of a young man in baggy pants than an 80 year old lady. Nobody would be afraid to admit it either. Being aware of a fact does not make a person prejudice. Knowing that men committ more violent crime than women does not make me a sexist. It is a fact that men committ more violent crime than women. So all things being equal, I would be in more danger if a man was approaching me than a woman. Being aware of this does not make me a sexist.

By the same token, being aware that the vast majority of terrorism is perpetrated by Muslims does not make someone a bigot. You love to accuse everyone of being bigots and racists. Yet the truth of the matter is that you make the same judgements as everyone sle does. Like everyone else, you would obviously be more fearful of a young man in baggy pants than an 80 year old lady, but you won't admit it because if you admitted it that would show what a hypocrite you are. I mean you can't say that it's ok to have a certain reaction to people based on their sex and age but not their religion.

Game, set, match!

Riot · #17 10-25-2010, 02:50 PM

Quote:

You obviously are "completely flummoxed by our debate skills" and that is why you refused to answer my question.

No, I didn't answer your question because it was stupid.

You made up two limited choices from Chuck's question, not based upon anything I answered or said. Chucks question was a circular, unanswerable straw man to start with. You demanded I answer A or B. You are so narrow minded you never considered there could be a C. So I ignored your stupid question.

So don't get all insulting and huffy with me, loser.

Rupert Pupkin · #18 10-25-2010, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

No, I didn't answer your question because it was stupid.

You made up two limited choices from Chuck's question, not based upon anything I answered or said. Chucks question was a circular, unanswerable straw man to start with. You demanded I answer A or B. You are so narrow minded you never considered there could be a C. So I ignored your stupid question.

So don't get all insulting and huffy with me, loser.

That's a good debate skill. If someone asks you a tough question, refuse to answer and use the excsue that "the question was stupid".

Riot · #19 10-25-2010, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

That's a good debate skill. If someone asks you a tough question, refuse to answer and use the excsue that "the question was stupid".

It is a good debate skill, to ignore the nonsensical.

But, hey, you keep making more posts having a fight with the imaginary me about what you guess I think about old ladies, males, females and violent crime - even though I never commented at all on this thread about it, and you don't have a clue what I think about it

Cause long posts like you wrote, above, arguing with me about something I never answered, paragraph after paragraph, really make you look .... good.

Rupert Pupkin · #20 10-25-2010, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

It is a good debate skill, to ignore the nonsensical.

But, hey, you keep making more posts having a fight with the imaginary me about what you guess I think about old ladies, males, females and violent crime - even though I never commented at all on this thread about it, and you don't have a clue what I think about it

Cause long posts like you wrote, above, arguing with me about something I never answered, paragraph after paragraph, really make you look .... good.

You say I don't have a clue what you think. I know exactly what you think and everyone else on this board knows what you think. You're not kidding anyone. You're not hard to read.

Your silence tells me more than anything. You are usually not shy about giving your opinion. When you are shy, the reason is obvious. You will never an answer a question that exposes your hypocrisy. You're not kidding anyone.