![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
5 YEARS overall was horrible, I had to make it 3. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Rick Violette with 2yo's on dirt at Saratoga since '98:
24-for-88 (27.3%) $3.86 ROI In 2yo dirt races at Saratoga that are 5.5fs or shorter: 15-for-41 (36.6% wins) $4.45 ROI Again ... a lot of the damage was done in the late 90's - Indian Charlie can tell you how I was a rabid Violette fan ten years ago. It took a while for me to figure out why he was so great with these obscurely bred types sprinting at Saratoga. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
How do you go back that far? When I plugged in just 5 it was not that good, I dont really remember late 90's, since I was no older then 14. Why is he so great? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() He's great with them because he gets the right kind and he doesn't try and train the speed out of them.
Say you've got one owner who wants to buy 8 horses for 200K a piece. You can go the Zito way and try to buy the 8 as yearlings looking for fairly nicely bred well put together classic types. Or you can buy 8 horses from Ocala and Timonium that don't have the best breeding or conformation - but are very quick. If you go the former - you're not going to look like much of a debut trainer. If you go with the latter - you're probably going to look like a good debut trainer. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 2010: 1-for-5
2009: 3-for-10 2008: 2-for-5 2007: 2-for-12 2006: 4-for-14 2005: 2-for-12 |