Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2010, 06:55 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
My number could be a little high. Myabe Z ran a 112 that day.

With regard to BP, horses do step up sometimes for a career best as also rans in a fast race. Look at Musket Man. He'd run a 99, a 102, and a 95 this year. Then he ran a 109 chasing QR in the Met Mile. What did MM run over the weekend? Around 100? Yet he somehow ran a 109 in the Met Mile. You are the numbers guy, not me, but I'm sure that this type of thing is not that unusual.
Of course he didn't run 100 this weekend. He ran much closer to 109 than 100. How can that be your evidence and you are miles wrong?

As for Shirreffs, please about the string already. He has 59 starts all year.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2010, 09:51 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Of course he didn't run 100 this weekend. He ran much closer to 109 than 100. How can that be your evidence and you are miles wrong?

As for Shirreffs, please about the string already. He has 59 starts all year.
You are right. I was thinking that Blame ran a 105. I was mixed up with Lookin' At Lucky. He ran a 105.

That would hardly be evidence even if I was right. It wouldn't prove anything. I was just looking for an example off the top of my head of a horse that stepped up and ran faster than they normally do, in defeat in a fast race. I gave a bad example since MM did run about a 107 or 108 in the Whitney.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2010, 09:59 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

The Whitney number was very much an educated guess Rupert. Even though it made sense on paper to give it a 111 - I'm not giving that figure the benefit of the doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2010, 10:21 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS View Post
The Whitney number was very much an educated guess Rupert. Even though it made sense on paper to give it a 111 - I'm not giving that figure the benefit of the doubt.
I don't think that number is too far off. I think it was actually a pretty fast race. I think 1:48 4/5 was a very good time on that track that day. I'm actually surprised they ran that fast on that track after running the half in :48. That track was not very fast that day. I would not have expected them to run much faster than 1:48 and change even if the pace was fast, not on that track.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.