|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
08-01-2010, 10:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" 
|
|
#2
08-01-2010, 10:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
An excerpt from an article in the BloodHorse
"A year after Rachel Alexandra completed the Preakness/Haskell double en route to Horse of the Year honors, Lookin At Lucky has accomplished the same feat -- against a Haskell field many consider the deepest in the race's 43-year history." http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...ookin-at-lucky
|
|
#3
08-01-2010, 10:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Just because people have watched horse racing and have been in the industry for a long, long time ... doesn't mean they have even the slightest idea what they're talking about when it comes to making competent judgments that involve a morsel of handicapping skill.
|
|
#4
08-01-2010, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
deep and good aren't necessarily the same thing. you had classic win/place horses in there, that's where they got the deep from. and yes, it's true, the race today drew a lot of the better horses this year compared to past haskells. doesn't mean it's a better crop tho. lookin at lucky won-someone had to. doesn't mean he's very, very good. or even very good. slow time, yet another slow time to add to all the other slow times this year.
|
|
#5
08-01-2010, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
