Do we need any more proof?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

if you read her sentence, she said both understand that it's complicated. the way it's written makes it sound that they get what many don't, but i don't think that's the case. i think everyone understands that it's a complicated issue.

LOL - the only one who keeps reading that sentence is Dell, who gets some scary weird high off it, even though back, a year or two? ago when it was written, it was just a small comment in the context of a greater discussion, not about the middle east.

Poor Dell.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - the only one who keeps reading that sentence is Dell.

Poor Dell.

I read it long ago, read it again and find it as delusional today as I did two years ago, only now it's far timelier.

BTW I 'post' it not 'read' it

"Obama has a strong interest in, and understanding of, the myriad of complexities involving the various countries in the middle east. Tribal relations, power struggles, economics, historic, religious, etc. Carter had (and has) the same. Both "get it" - that it's an incredibly complicated, multi-layered area of the world."

How do you come up with this stuff? It's comedy gold!

[dellinger63]

More proof and this is sickening!

http://www.breitbart.tv/helen-thomas...germany-poland

[dellinger63]

This woman is as ugly on the inside as she is on the out.

http://dailyradar.com/beltwayblips/v...use-s-lack-of/

[geeker2]

It's ok as long as you apologize

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by geeker2

It's ok as long as you apologize

a la Rev. Jesse 'Hymietown' Jackson

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I read it long ago, read it again and find it as delusional today as I did two years ago, only now it's far timelier

And sadly enough, for two years, you are still scarily "fixated" upon some passing comment internet posting You are unable to comprehend how that fit into the discussion at the time. And you just choose to ignore what I've said multiple times about Obama's and/or Carter's middle east policy.

"Delusional" is certainly relative

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

And sadly enough, for two years, you are still scarily "fixated" upon some passing comment internet posting:

The comment was originally made after you told Chuck to read Carter's latest book as though his anti-Israel stance is to be taken seriously. You were raving about Obama's speech in Cairo. It was hardly in passing. You're entitled to your views no matter how far out they may be. Say it loud and proud!


IMO the two Presidents you believe 'get it' are closer to the views of Helen Thomas and Rev. Jesse Jackson than they are to what I consider the 'norm' and for Israel that’s scary. I 'get' they are both pro-Palestine.

[Riot]

The comment was originally made after you told Chuck to read Carter's latest book as though his anti-Israel stance is to be taken seriously.

"As though" ?? Are you kidding me? At the time I told you I didn't agree with his middle eastern policies.

One last time:

Originally Posted by dellinger63
BTW Some Americans RIOT for one agree with and embrace the Obama/Carter policy

No, Dell. I do not. And for you to repeatedly say I do, remains stupid.

You were raving about Obama's speech in Cairo. It was hardly in passing.

Yes. I admired the speech for it's integration of nuance regarding the region. Nuance - a concept well-lost on you. Doh.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

"As though" ?? Are you kidding me? At the time I told you I didn't agree with his middle eastern policies..

At the time you told me no such thing. Actually you told me that you weren't going to discuss his policy and if I wanted to start a new thread to have at it.

Only later when I pointed out the one man you cited as 'getting it' thinks that Israel is the worst perpetrator of human rights violations in the world did you state you didn't agree with his mid-east policy though for some reason you still were reading and pushing his books.

As I said before be proud of what you write and when it's quoted. It was one of your finest, even in a RIOT sort of way, for those who 'get you'

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

At the time you told me no such thing. Actually you told me that you weren't going to discuss his policy and if I wanted to start a new thread to have at it.

Only later when I pointed out the one man you cited as 'getting it' thinks that Israel is the worst perpetrator of human rights violations in the world did you state you didn't agree with his mid-east policy though for some reason you still were reading and pushing his books.

As I said before be proud of what you write and when it's quoted. It was one of your finest, even in a RIOT sort of way, for those who 'get you'

That is sounding an awful lot like "checkmate"...

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

At the time you told me no such thing. Actually you told me that you weren't going to discuss his policy and if I wanted to start a new thread to have at it.

For chrissakes, you fool, go re-read the thread - and all the other threads about it you've started since

Only you would attempt to diss somebody on this board, and when caught out making crap up in your diss, create such a ridiculous straw man to cover your butt.

I'd think you'd be happy I agree with your political view on an issue, instead of making an azz out of yourself trying to insist I do not