No love for the Preakness?

slotdirt · #1 04-19-2010, 12:17 PM

D'Funnybone.

randallscott35 · #2 04-19-2010, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt

D'Funnybone.

Not anymore. They are staying 1 turn the rest of the year

NTamm1215 · #3 04-19-2010, 12:21 PM

This is a good point and I think some of it has to do with last year's result and an "anything goes" type attitude about the Derby. The fact that the graded stakes earnings bar has been set so high this year as well leaves many out of the mix. Should more connections be concentrating on the Preakness? Sure, however the memories of a 50-1 outsider winning the Derby from a race at Sunland that no one cared about from a trainer who hadn't won a thoroughbred race all year are still fresh.

NT

Danzig · #4 04-19-2010, 12:24 PM

miner's reserve may go in the preakness. typically the top horses point to the top race, the preakness generally gets the top from the derby, and then a few that get hot but not soon enough to make churchill-horses from the withers, the federico tesio, derby trial, etc. maybe the lexington winner?

letswastemoney · #5 04-19-2010, 12:44 PM

One Kentucky Derby would mean more to me than 10 Preaknesses if I were an owner.

How many people get to say "I won the Kentucky Derby."

How many people know what you are talking about outside of horse racing when you say "I won the Preakness."

slotdirt · #6 04-19-2010, 01:39 PM

It's not like the Preakness is a nothing race or something. There seem to have been at least a few years in recent years where the Preakness winner was considered a stronger stallion prospect than the Derby victory. 2001 and 2005 come immediately to mind.

RolloTomasi · #7 04-19-2010, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt

It's not like the Preakness is a nothing race or something. There seem to have been at least a few years in recent years where the Preakness winner was considered a stronger stallion prospect than the Derby victory. 2001 and 2005 come immediately to mind.

In a lot of instances, the Preakness tends to be the more "honest" or "formful" race in the long run. The road to the Derby is such a clusterfucl< that its almost as if the race itself is an anti-climax and tends to be run in a haphazard fashion (breakneck pace, auxiliary post positions, all sorts of traffic woes going on, etc.). The Belmont, at 12f, is an anomaly that also really has no bearing on the rest of the year in most cases.

For these reasons it's also a race to catch a good horse at an overlaid price. How many beaten Derby favorites have bounced back at Pimlico in recent times? Snow Chief, Prairie Bayou, Point Given, Afleet Alex, Timber Country, Hansel. Well-meant Derby horses like Louis Quatorze, Pine Bluff, Tabasco Cat. Certainly, despite the trouble trips from each, the '89 Easy Goer-Sunday Silence Preakness was the more accurate result of that Triple Crown series.

This year, and I realize its much too early to make any substantial predictions, I'm already on the lookout for expected Derby dud Sidney's Candy to be more of a threat at Pimlico than at Churchill.

RolloTomasi · #8 04-19-2010, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS

It has changed though last ten years. As you mentioned Preakness used to be completely different race- with many of the Derby losers and also some fresh horses. Now the Derby losers tend to pass the Preakness and wait to come back in Belmont

True. Lemon Drop Kid, Commendable, Empire Maker, Birdstone, Summer Bird, Jazil. But I'm willing to bet a couple of those would have done fine at Pimlico, too.

Danzig · #9 04-19-2010, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS

Exactly, and if a breeder probably 20 times.

More prestige in winning Belmont or Travers then Preakness at this point. But when you compare to Derby not even in discussion.

No one buys a horse with hope it will win the Preakness some day

actually, maryland horsemen say that very thing-maybe not so much buy, but breed. but yeah, everyone wants the derby.

Merlinsky · #10 04-19-2010, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

miner's reserve may go in the preakness. typically the top horses point to the top race, the preakness generally gets the top from the derby, and then a few that get hot but not soon enough to make churchill-horses from the withers, the federico tesio, derby trial, etc. maybe the lexington winner?

Eightyfiveinafifty might try to join the infield crowd at Pimlico. Does that count?

Seriously though the biggest case of a stable ditching the Derby and aiming to kick things off with the Preakness (as far as I know) was Man o' War. The Derby was a big race but not quite the phenomenon it is today, and Riddle wasn't about to go to Kentucky of all ungodly places to run 1 1/4 in early May. He thought that was for the birds. Sufficed to say, today I'm sure he'd be more easily persuaded. Didn't he get grumpy about sending War Admiral to begin with? It's such a shame since MOW probably would've been the easiest TC winner in history. It's not like there was a Sham in that Derby.

Danzig · #11 04-19-2010, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky

Eightyfiveinafifty might try to join the infield crowd at Pimlico. Does that count?
Seriously though the biggest case of a stable ditching the Derby and aiming to kick things off with the Preakness (as far as I know) was Man o' War. The Derby was a big race but not quite the phenomenon it is today, and Riddle wasn't about to go to Kentucky of all ungodly places to run 1 1/4 in early May. He thought that was for the birds. Sufficed to say, today I'm sure he'd be more easily persuaded. Didn't he get grumpy about sending War Admiral to begin with? It's such a shame since MOW probably would've been the easiest TC winner in history. It's not like there was a Sham in that Derby.

blackthroatedwind · #12 04-19-2010, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt

D'Funnybone.

I imagine after seeing his sheet numbers they decided to get a little more realistic.

RolloTomasi · #13 04-19-2010, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I imagine after seeing his sheet numbers they decided to get a little more realistic.

Beyond the TC, do you see anything that can sprint or mile with D'Funnybone down the road? Perhaps A Little Warm, Awesome Act, Mission Impazable, Conveyance?

blackthroatedwind · #14 04-19-2010, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

Beyond the TC, do you see anything that can sprint or mile with D'Funnybone down the road? Perhaps A Little Warm, Awesome Act, Mission Impazable, Conveyance?

I think his run is over. He's OK but I honestly am far from convinced as others possibly improve he will be a major factor.

hoovesupsideyourhead · #15 04-19-2010, 04:07 PM

west ocean.

RolloTomasi · #16 04-19-2010, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

west ocean.

Don't know much about that filly beyond her FG race. Does she run on dirt at all?

I was thinking about the 3yo races this summer anyways, so we won't have to worry about her until the BC if they choose to take on males.

NTamm1215 · #17 04-19-2010, 04:56 PM

West Ocean got a 98 and was tremendously impressive. I don't know where Pletcher's going to run her but she's very good right now.

NT

ateamstupid · #18 04-19-2010, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

Beyond the TC, do you see anything that can sprint or mile with D'Funnybone down the road? Perhaps A Little Warm, Awesome Act, Mission Impazable, Conveyance?

85/50? Or are you assuming Contessa ruins him?

RolloTomasi · #19 04-19-2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

85/50? Or are you assuming Contessa ruins him?

No, I forgot about him. However, I was thinking more of the extended sprints and flat miles like the Woody Stephens, King's Bishop, and Jerome.

Even though he won the sparse Bay Shore at 7f, I suspect he'll be at his best at 6f ultimately if he survives the route experiment.