Rahmbo

dellinger63 · #1 03-08-2010, 11:05 AM

too funny

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...for_votes.html

Danzig · #2 03-08-2010, 12:26 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/ma...agewanted=1&hp

an excellent article about emanual rahm and the president. i'll warn you, it's long. i read all eight pages, i suggest everyone politically-minded read it.

Danzig · #3 03-08-2010, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

too funny

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...for_votes.html

massa-isn't he the one 'retiring' because he sexually harrassed one his male aides?

dellinger63 · #4 03-08-2010, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

massa-isn't he the one 'retiring' because he sexually harrassed one his male aides?

that's him! Guess he didn't ask or tell while in the navy.

Riot · #5 03-08-2010, 10:16 PM

Quote:

"He is an individual who would sell his mother to get a vote. He would strap his children to the front end of a steam locomotive."

Pretty stupid and clueless analogy. He's talking about a guy who refused the job with Obama for the longest time because of his grade school daughters (keeping them in their school, not moving them, etc). The guy is well-known as a family man.

No one says Rahm isn't tough - he is.

Cannon Shell · #6 03-08-2010, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Pretty stupid and clueless analogy. He's talking about a guy who refused the job with Obama for the longest time because of his grade school daughters (keeping them in their school, not moving them, etc). The guy is well-known as a family man.

No one says Rahm isn't tough - he is.

Uh, If the guy is a well known family man than the analogy makes even more sense.

You see he is so singleminded in getting bills passed he would sacrifice his much loved children to get it done. He is THAT committed.

You do realize he didnt actually mean he would physically strap his children to a train, right?

Riot · #7 03-09-2010, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Uh, If the guy is a well known family man than the analogy makes even more sense.

You see he is so singleminded in getting bills passed he would sacrifice his much loved children to get it done. He is THAT committed.

You do realize he didnt actually mean he would physically strap his children to a train, right?

You do realize that analogy doesn't encompass that which is unimaginable?

The import was that the guy is ruthlessly careless of the damage he does.

You do realize that didnt requires an apostrophe, right? I don't want 'Zig to freak.