NFL Draft

Cannon Shell · #1 10-19-2009, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Yeah, cause that was the only td catch he's had all season. Other than that, he's done nothing. He's only fifth in receiving yardage, first in receiving yards per game (remember, he missed two games), third in yards per catch (his 19.6 is behind a guy that has one catch for 23 yards and the second place guy is 19.7), and he's tied for the most touchdowns. If we can't talk about him in the convesation of best rookies, we can't talk about anyone.

He has 12 catches in 6 games. Mike Vrabel catches TD passes too.

King Glorious · #2 10-19-2009, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

He has 12 catches in 6 games. Mike Vrabel catches TD passes too.

He missed two games. He has 12 in four games. Only one less than Maclin has in five. And he has more touchdowns than Maclin. What does Vrabel have to do with this? We are talking about rookie wide receivers. You are the one that asked what do I base it on. What would make you say that he's not better than Maclin? You have brought up his garbage touchdown. Ok, take that away and he's still got as many as Maclin in less games. He's also got more yards. You act like I'm comparing him to Randy Moss or Andre Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald. What part of rookie wide receivers was lost on you?

Cannon Shell · #3 10-19-2009, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

He missed two games. He has 12 in four games. Only one less than Maclin has in five. And he has more touchdowns than Maclin. What does Vrabel have to do with this? We are talking about rookie wide receivers. You are the one that asked what do I base it on. What would make you say that he's not better than Maclin? You have brought up his garbage touchdown. Ok, take that away and he's still got as many as Maclin in less games. He's also got more yards. You act like I'm comparing him to Randy Moss or Andre Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald. What part of rookie wide receivers was lost on you?

What does Vrabel have to do with this? He has a lot of TD catches. That is proof that TD catches arent the greatest way to measure a receiver.

We are talking about 4 games worth of action, mostly against dreadful pass defenses. How can you say that Nicks is better than anyone based on 4 games, all blowouts? Not to mention it isnt as though he has had a 11 catch, 180 yard game to point to. Also it is kind of tough to measure Crabtree so far isnt it?
And why is he better than Percy Harvin?

Cannon Shell · #4 10-19-2009, 06:17 PM

And in post #3 of this thread you said that Nicks was the best player in the draft.

Bigsmc · #5 10-19-2009, 06:27 PM

None of them can carry Sammy Stroughter's jock.

3kings · #6 10-19-2009, 06:35 PM

Hurrying to DT fantasy league to drop/add.

Bigsmc · #7 10-19-2009, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings

Hurrying to DT fantasy league to drop/add.

I already did.....out of sheer desperation. Nothing available and I have huge WR Bye week and injury issues.

King Glorious · #8 09-14-2010, 01:13 AM

I still like Hakeem Nicks.

King Glorious · #9 10-19-2009, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

What does Vrabel have to do with this? He has a lot of TD catches. That is proof that TD catches arent the greatest way to measure a receiver.

We are talking about 4 games worth of action, mostly against dreadful pass defenses. How can you say that Nicks is better than anyone based on 4 games, all blowouts? Not to mention it isnt as though he has had a 11 catch, 180 yard game to point to. Also it is kind of tough to measure Crabtree so far isnt it?
And why is he better than Percy Harvin?

Ok, well if numbers so far aren't good enough for you to go on, I'll just stick with he's better because I think he's better. Does anyone know for sure who's better than anyone else at this point? Doubtful. That's what the draft is all about. Evaluating the talent and forming an opinion. Doesn't make that opinion always right. The so-called experts get it wrong all the time so I would think it would be ok for me to get it wrong. I state my opinion that I think Nicks is better. If you don't think so, that's yours. You asked me what do I base it on? If you think someone is better, what do you base it on?

Cannon Shell · #10 10-19-2009, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Ok, well if numbers so far aren't good enough for you to go on, I'll just stick with he's better because I think he's better. Does anyone know for sure who's better than anyone else at this point? Doubtful. That's what the draft is all about. Evaluating the talent and forming an opinion. Doesn't make that opinion always right. The so-called experts get it wrong all the time so I would think it would be ok for me to get it wrong. I state my opinion that I think Nicks is better. If you don't think so, that's yours. You asked me what do I base it on? If you think someone is better, what do you base it on?

I think Nicks may turn out to be a good player but there isnt much to go on so far.

#11 10-19-2009, 08:41 PM

Ooga Booga or whatever the f.uck that Samoans name is that played for USC and is now with the Bengals is the best rookie in the league.

NTamm1215 · #12 10-19-2009, 09:03 PM

Johnny Knox(ville) has been pretty good for Chicago. He beat them like they stole something last night when the coverage was 1 on 1.

NT