![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's Canada for petes sake...you really think they would have ruled differently?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I hope they are not lumping overeaters/"food addicts" into this ruling, I feel it should be reserved for a very few severely obese people who suffer verifiable physical disorders. If the disease concept of food addiction is honored here in this ruling, then I feel they need to provide smokers with a place on airplanes (and every other public place), and us drug addicts should have an area on the flight to get a little higher if need be
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I envision an excessively neat squeeky white board drawing. The word lumping works well here as well. Attachment 1101 Last edited by pgardn : 05-09-2009 at 09:45 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I apologize for any hurt feelings
and the bizarre nature of my post. |