Jazil to finally try turf!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

The only thing that stinks is your attitude about horses and racing, as well as your insight. How does Jazil disgrace the TC by stepping on the track? Can you explain that? It was a foregone conclusion before the Belmont last year that there would be no "great" ones coming from that group. Should they have just cancelled the race in advance to avoid the embarrassment?

Who is embarrassed by this? you? please explain what is so embarrassing.

Why must all horses fit your greatness criteria or else be considered "stinking" "pigs"?

So what if Jazil won a classic, but is not on par with others who have done so. You act like they should just retire the horse out of disgrace.

He disgraces it by being a pig. The best races should be won by the best horses. Everyday, non-descript horses shouldn't be winning them. Horses that are eligible for nw1x races shouldn't be winning them. If they are ordinary races and ordinary horses are going to be winning them, let's stop having rules regarding who can run in them. Let's just let anyone enter and the luck of the draw determines who gets in. Then maybe we can have a couple of $15k claimers in there while Street Sense and Circular Quay don't make the draw.

U ask me who is embarrassed by this. I am. U are too. All racing fans should be.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

If they are ordinary races and ordinary horses are going to be winning them, let's stop having rules regarding who can run in them. Let's just let anyone enter and the luck of the draw determines who gets in. Then maybe we can have a couple of $15k claimers in there while Street Sense and Circular Quay don't make the draw.

Huh?

[ninetoone]

Don't feed the trolls...

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

He disgraces it by being a pig. The best races should be won by the best horses. Everyday, non-descript horses shouldn't be winning them. Horses that are eligible for nw1x races shouldn't be winning them. If they are ordinary races and ordinary horses are going to be winning them, let's stop having rules regarding who can run in them. Let's just let anyone enter and the luck of the draw determines who gets in. Then maybe we can have a couple of $15k claimers in there while Street Sense and Circular Quay don't make the draw.

U ask me who is embarrassed by this. I am. U are too. All racing fans should be.

Your calling him a pig does nothing but embarrass yourself.

What rules did Jazil break by running in the Belmont?
Who was better than Jazil in the Belmont? Was he not the best horse in the field going 12 furlongs? So who should have won that race that would have made it less embarrassing for you?

Don't speak for me, as I am not embarrassed one bit by Jazil. For the life of me I don't know why you would be embarrassed. In fact I am heartened by the fact he is racing still and trying new things like the turf. He is a 4 YO that has started a grand total of 11 times now, yet you act as if he is some over the hill has been, or never was.

The best races are won by the best horses on that day. Who would you like to win the best races? Are there any horses that would please you?

If the entire field is made up of what you call ordinary horses, what are we supposed to do? I'll ask you again, should the Belmont have been canceled last year because they were all ordinary horses? What races have as a condition that in order to be eligible the horse must be extraordinary?

You know this was a simple thread stating that Jazil was trying the turf for the first time, but it appears that you have taken it to mean that "Jazil is one of the greats of the last ten years". You couldn't wait to jump in and denigrate the horse.

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

Your calling him a pig does nothing but embarrass yourself.

What rules did Jazil break by running in the Belmont?
Who was better than Jazil in the Belmont? Was he not the best horse in the field going 12 furlongs? So who should have won that race that would have made it less embarrassing for you?

Don't speak for me, as I am not embarrassed one bit by Jazil. For the life of me I don't know why you would be embarrassed. In fact I am heartened by the fact he is racing still and trying new things like the turf. He is a 4 YO that has started a grand total of 11 times now, yet you act as if he is some over the hill has been, or never was.

The best races are won by the best horses on that day. Who would you like to win the best races? Are there any horses that would please you?

If the entire field is made up of what you call ordinary horses, what are we supposed to do? I'll ask you again, should the Belmont have been canceled last year because they were all ordinary horses? What races have as a condition that in order to be eligible the horse must be extraordinary?

You know this was a simple thread stating that Jazil was trying the turf for the first time, but it appears that you have taken it to mean that "Jazil is one of the greats of the last ten years". You couldn't wait to jump in and denigrate the horse.

See that is the key with Mr. Glorious...when he isn't saving all of us a lot of time in handicapping the Derby (you DO know the winning exacta right?) he is waiting in the wings to put down some horse. It takes a big man to sit behind a keyboard and call a horse a pig.

As you can imagine, his love is spread on the other forum as well...

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Funny too, I remember reading about how upset he was that people were denigrating his beloved Duke after they lost in the NCAA tourney. Isn't it ironic, don't ya think? It's like rain.....Sorry, for a second I thought it was 1995 again.

Noooooooo, not that sooooooong!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Funny too, I remember reading about how upset he was that people were denigrating his beloved Duke after they lost in the NCAA tourney. Isn't it ironic, don't ya think? It's like rain.....Sorry, for a second I thought it was 1995 again.

Upset that people talked bad about Duke? U didn't read correctly then. What I said was it was funny how a thread could be put up with the guy talking bad about a human being, a person that I happened to have had contact with and nothing was said to them about how mean spirited it was yet when any word was spoken against Barbaro, they were ready to hang me.

[blackthroatedwind]

Why the hate for Jazil?

Let's recount his resume....lost by a half length in a NW1X to Corinthian.....second in the Wood Memorial.....fourth in the Kentucky Derby.....won the Belmont.

Sounds OK to me.

No, he's not a world beater by any stretch of the imagination but he's also a far more accomplished animal than recent Belmont winners Commendable and Sarava. Bringing up that he won the Belmont while eligible for a NW1X is to completely ignore the realities of the current Triple Crown preps. Do I think it's great for racing that conditional allowances have suffered in the " rush-rush " approach with 3YOs nowadays? No, I don't. And I don't think it is overall great for the game and is most likely one of the reasons horses don't stay healthy for long anymore. However, it is what it is, and Jazil, as a racehorse, should not be discredited because of this.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Why the hate for Jazil?

Let's recount his resume....lost by a half length in a NW1X to Corinthian.....second in the Wood Memorial.....fourth in the Kentucky Derby.....won the Belmont.

Sounds OK to me.

No, he's not a world beater by any stretch of the imagination but he's also a far more accomplished animal than recent Belmont winners Commendable and Sarava. Bringing up that he won the Belmont while eligible for a NW1X is to completely ignore the realities of the current Triple Crown preps. Do I think it's great for racing that conditional allowances have suffered in the " rush-rush " approach with 3YOs nowadays? No, I don't. And I don't think it is overall great for the game and is most likely one of the reasons horses don't stay healthy for long anymore. However, it is what it is, and Jazil, as a racehorse, should not be discredited because of this.

A voice of reason. I think u have discussed horses with me long enough to know where I am coming from with this. This wasn't about Jazil, per se. It could have easily been Sarava or Commendable. It was about the state of the game, as u say, it is what it is. It's about a horse that's not done much of anything of note in his career, other than winning a Classic race, being givin credit for being more. When I hear things about how we should happy he's still in training, it kills me. Why should we be? In a way, I could be doing this same thing while talking about horses like Bernardini, Ghostzapper, Smarty Jones, Discreet Cat, etc. In those cases, I'm guilty myself of some of the same things I'm bothered by with those that talk about Jazil. The way the game is today, we have had to lower our standards so that we can have something to believe in. In reality, even though I call him a great horse, calling Discreet Cat a great horse lessens the accomplishments of the actual real great horses, horses like Bid and Dr Fager and Affirmed. That's how I feel about this situation with Jazil. It's a personal thing but I want to feel like our best races are won by our best horses. When I look back in the history books and see the names of the horses that have won our Kentucky Derby, our Belmont Stakes, our Travers, JCGC, SA Hcp....I want to know those were the best horses we had in those years. Not some horse that just happened to be the best horse that day of a bunch of bad ones.

Maybe everyone else is willing to just accept it the way it is now and be happy about it. Be happy that we are able to see Jazil come back. Be happy to see the 4-5 race "campaigns" that make up the seasons for top horses nowdays. Like I said, I'm guilty of it myself to an extent. So I guess if people want to be happy with this stuff, that's their right. I want better. I want the game to be better than this.

[King Glorious]

Question for anyone that knows the answer.

After the race, McLaughlin shrugged his shoulders. "Well, that didn't work," he said. "We know the rest of the year now he'll run in dirt races. It's too bad he had to try the turf for the first time on that kind of a course."

My question is if McLaughlin thought it was the soft turf that was the problem, why is he giving up on grass racing now? Wouldn't it stand to reason that he might want to try running on a firm turf course before giving up on it?

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

A voice of reason. I think u have discussed horses with me long enough to know where I am coming from with this. This wasn't about Jazil, per se. It could have easily been Sarava or Commendable. It was about the state of the game, as u say, it is what it is. It's about a horse that's not done much of anything of note in his career, other than winning a Classic race, being givin credit for being more. When I hear things about how we should happy he's still in training, it kills me. Why should we be? In a way, I could be doing this same thing while talking about horses like Bernardini, Ghostzapper, Smarty Jones, Discreet Cat, etc. In those cases, I'm guilty myself of some of the same things I'm bothered by with those that talk about Jazil. The way the game is today, we have had to lower our standards so that we can have something to believe in. In reality, even though I call him a great horse, calling Discreet Cat a great horse lessens the accomplishments of the actual real great horses, horses like Bid and Dr Fager and Affirmed. That's how I feel about this situation with Jazil. It's a personal thing but I want to feel like our best races are won by our best horses. When I look back in the history books and see the names of the horses that have won our Kentucky Derby, our Belmont Stakes, our Travers, JCGC, SA Hcp....I want to know those were the best horses we had in those years. Not some horse that just happened to be the best horse that day of a bunch of bad ones.

Maybe everyone else is willing to just accept it the way it is now and be happy about it. Be happy that we are able to see Jazil come back. Be happy to see the 4-5 race "campaigns" that make up the seasons for top horses nowdays. Like I said, I'm guilty of it myself to an extent. So I guess if people want to be happy with this stuff, that's their right. I want better. I want the game to be better than this.

Okay but here is my problem with what you say here. Are there actually many people that do claim "greatness" for Jazil? I don't think so. Doesn't it make sense to be happy he is back simply because he is a halfway decent older router? The sport needs as many of these as it can get right now.
You seem to set up only two ways of classifying a horse. They are either "great" or they are a "pig." Is that fair? If Jazil is a "pig" what word would you use to describe horses like Bluegrass Cat that he beat in the Belmont? What word would you use to describe a $15,000 claimer? If you follow your logic it would seem like 1 out of every 10,000 horses would be great and the other 9,999 would all be pigs. That is a bit simplistic isn't it?
It all just seems strange to me, because it seems like you are saying that if he finished second in the Belmont you wouldn't care about him at all......but since he won it, you feel the need to bash him.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Maybe everyone else is willing to just accept it the way it is now and be happy about it. Be happy that we are able to see Jazil come back. Be happy to see the 4-5 race "campaigns" that make up the seasons for top horses nowdays. Like I said, I'm guilty of it myself to an extent. So I guess if people want to be happy with this stuff, that's their right. I want better. I want the game to be better than this.

First you imply that you aren't willing to just accept the way it is now,
then you say you're guilty of it to an extent. So how are you different than anyone else? huh?

If this whole bashing of Jazil and calling him a pig is your way of lamenting that racing was so much better in the past, why didn't you just say that in the beginning?

Do you think you are some sharpy who has observed racings slide and that no one else has noticed and just accepts it unknowingly? No one on here is totally happy with the state of racing today. You question why people accept this, as if there is an alternative. What do you suggest we do?

So you are not happy, embarrassed, and don't accept what racing has become. So what? What are YOU doing about it besides running around screaming that certain horses are pigs?

I wish that racing was on the level it was when I first came to know about it decades ago, but I am not running around miserable each day, pouting and pointing fingers. I'm too busy enjoying what we have which includes all types of horses, even those like Jazil.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

Your calling him a pig does nothing but embarrass yourself.

What rules did Jazil break by running in the Belmont?
Who was better than Jazil in the Belmont? Was he not the best horse in the field going 12 furlongs? So who should have won that race that would have made it less embarrassing for you?

Don't speak for me, as I am not embarrassed one bit by Jazil. For the life of me I don't know why you would be embarrassed. In fact I am heartened by the fact he is racing still and trying new things like the turf. He is a 4 YO that has started a grand total of 11 times now, yet you act as if he is some over the hill has been, or never was.

The best races are won by the best horses on that day. Who would you like to win the best races? Are there any horses that would please you?

If the entire field is made up of what you call ordinary horses, what are we supposed to do? I'll ask you again, should the Belmont have been canceled last year because they were all ordinary horses? What races have as a condition that in order to be eligible the horse must be extraordinary?

You know this was a simple thread stating that Jazil was trying the turf for the first time, but it appears that you have taken it to mean that "Jazil is one of the greats of the last ten years". You couldn't wait to jump in and denigrate the horse.

Hossy and yourself are going to be remembered for this.

Extra credit...and plenty of it.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by mortimerdexterfoxworthy

Hossy and yourself are going to be remembered for this.

Extra credit...and plenty of it.

is this the same MFD? frankly i don't know how to take whatever you say.

[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

He disgraces it by being a pig. The best races should be won by the best horses. Everyday, non-descript horses shouldn't be winning them. Horses that are eligible for nw1x races shouldn't be winning them. If they are ordinary races and ordinary horses are going to be winning them, let's stop having rules regarding who can run in them. Let's just let anyone enter and the luck of the draw determines who gets in. Then maybe we can have a couple of $15k claimers in there while Street Sense and Circular Quay don't make the draw.

U ask me who is embarrassed by this. I am. U are too. All racing fans should be.

Pathetic. And it's not Jazil I'm referring to.

--Dunbar

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

He disgraces it by being a pig. The best races should be won by the best horses. Everyday, non-descript horses shouldn't be winning them. Horses that are eligible for nw1x races shouldn't be winning them. If they are ordinary races and ordinary horses are going to be winning them, let's stop having rules regarding who can run in them. Let's just let anyone enter and the luck of the draw determines who gets in. Then maybe we can have a couple of $15k claimers in there while Street Sense and Circular Quay don't make the draw.

U ask me who is embarrassed by this. I am. U are too. All racing fans should be.

I know just the place you'll fit in...many there think and act like you!