|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-09-2007, 12:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
kudos to byk.....
allthough i tend to pass by the front page of this sight after reading it...steve commentary on the first page is on point...congrats ..
hooves.. 
|
|
#4
01-09-2007, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strong points, Steve.
I'm looking forward to the Filly & Mare Sprint. Why a Turf Sprint wasn't added is the real question. It just further solidifies the view that the powers that be in the industry have no idea what they're doing.
|
|
#5
01-09-2007, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good article although I disagree with the premise. I think the creation of these races will create demand for logical preps leading up to them especially in the Mile and the Juvenile Turf Divisions. Yeah, this year may be a little rocky but I think down the line it will be for the better of the sport and the preps will be created to make the races make sense. You do make a good point as to whether or not they will go directly to G1 status. I have been wondering that myself. I'd actually like to see them be G2 events so that they don't dilute the normal 8 BC races and instead supplement them with additional good racing and a reason to go to the BC site for the Friday before. I highly doubt that happens though.
|
|
#6
01-09-2007, 01:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some solid arguments, however one point I definitely disagree with is that Monmouth is a questionable venue. It's a lovely, historic racetrack that has proven to handle large crowds well. It's about time they finally made it there.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
|
|
#7
01-09-2007, 01:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd rather see a 250k turf sprint stakes on the undercard or something. It would draw pretty much the same field that a one million dollar race would anyway. No way this should be a BC race. I do question the use of the word ersatz in the article, but other than that, it is great. 
|
Hybrid Mode
