![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tax Court Ruling can be read here...
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistor...ER.TCM.WPD.pdf Key point is that casual gambler was allowed to NET casino jackpot W-2G with additional slot play. This does not mean you net losses with wins through the year as a casual gambler. ...from ruling petitioners entered the casino with $500 and took home $1,600 of winnings, the amount of gambling income which petitioners should have reported on their 2005 return was $1,100 ($2,000 jackpot winnings less $500 brought to the casino for gambling and less $400 taken from the jackpot for additional gambling) rather than $2,000 as determined in the notice of deficiency. KEY HERE IS THEY ONLY NEEDED TO REPORT $1,100 and NOT $2,000 W-2G AMOUNT ...also Drawing an analogy to the recovery of a capital investment, this Court has held that a casual gambler’s gross income from a wagering transaction should be calculated by subtracting the bets placed to produce the winnings, not as a deduction in calculating adjusted gross income or taxable income but as a preliminary computation in determining gross income This would be very beneficial to people who only take the standard deduction or who live in states who have a state income tax which does not allow gambling loss deductions. To me there should be no difference if a person substitutes casino with racetrack in the above ruling. Last edited by SundaySilence : 01-04-2010 at 03:28 PM. |