The Fierce Urgency of Pork

timmgirvan · #1 02-06-2009, 12:04 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...502766_pf.html

Ummm....the Emperor has NO clothes!

ateamstupid · #2 02-06-2009, 12:22 PM

I'm seriously going to start consolidating all of your neocon editorial links into one thread. This is getting ridiculous.

#3 02-06-2009, 12:27 PM

Just put him on ignore, you big sissy.

ateamstupid · #4 02-06-2009, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Just put him on ignore, you big sissy.

OK Vujacic, if it were just annoying me, I would.

#5 02-06-2009, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

OK Vujacic, if it were just annoying me, I would.

Well go ahead and partially censor the guy then. It's the liberal way.

timmgirvan · #6 02-06-2009, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I'm seriously going to start consolidating all of your neocon editorial links into one thread. This is getting ridiculous.

You are clueless,Joey. And with just a little bit of power...you're Machiavellian(look it up)

ateamstupid · #7 02-06-2009, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

You are clueless,Joey. And with just a little bit of power...you're Machiavellian(look it up)

I know what Machiavellian means you dipshit. You're the one who needs to look it up. If there were a lib starting a billion new threads with every liberal editorial they found, I'd say the same thing.

Take it easy, I'm not going to cease your pollution.

#8 02-06-2009, 12:56 PM

Why should he have to take it easy in the first place just because you have sand in your vagine on anything not pro-Obama?
Lets be real here. The guy is not doing so hot right now. All that talky talky is being long forgotten and the worky worky is under the microscope. It will get far worse for the hysterical Obama supporters.

timmgirvan · #9 02-06-2009, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I know what Machiavellian means you dipshit. You're the one who needs to look it up. If there were a lib starting a billion new threads with every liberal editorial they found, I'd say the same thing.

Take it easy, I'm not going to cease your pollution.

You might try reading the posts...but I wouldn't want you to tip over the tiny applecart in your brain!

ateamstupid · #10 02-06-2009, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

You might try reading the posts...but I wouldn't want you to tip over the tiny applecart in your brain!

Thanks, but I've read enough of Krauthammer's hysteria to know it's not worth any more of my time.

And LOL @ Pants. Like you wouldn't be bitching your little heart out if there were a liberal version of Tim here starting threads with every liberal editorial or blog post they come across. Indepedent my ass.

timmgirvan · #11 02-06-2009, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Thanks, but I've read enough of Krauthammer's hysteria to know it's not worth any more of my time.

And LOL @ Pants. Like you wouldn't be bitching your little heart out if there were a liberal version of Tim here starting threads with every liberal editorial or blog post they come across. Indepedent my ass.

Well,Joey, here's your opportunity to explain the dilemna of this plan and the plans of the Great One(and I don't mean Gordie Howe) Please exhibit for the rest of us how this plan will help this country immediately....not 2-5 years down the road.

#12 02-06-2009, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Thanks, but I've read enough of Krauthammer's hysteria to know it's not worth any more of my time.

And LOL @ Pants. Like you wouldn't be bitching your little heart out if there were a liberal version of Tim here starting threads with every liberal editorial or blog post they come across. Indepedent my ass.

You've used that retort before, Punchy.

SCUDSBROTHER · #13 02-06-2009, 02:14 PM

I got this Charles Krauthammer guy on "ignore." That's a bitter robot of some sort.

timmgirvan · #14 02-06-2009, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I got this Charles Krauthammer guy on "ignore." That's a bitter robot of some sort.

Yeah...sometimes TRUTH is a bitter pill to swallow!

SCUDSBROTHER · #15 02-06-2009, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Yeah...sometimes TRUTH is a bitter pill to swallow!

I never pay any attention to him, because he doesn't have a single ray of sunshine in him. I've seen him on Fox sometimes, and he's just a bitter freak. Often, paralyzed people are gunna be good negative writers(bingo..that's him.)

timmgirvan · #16 02-06-2009, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I never pay any attention to him, because he doesn't have a single ray of sunshine in him. I've seen him on Fox sometimes, and he's just a bitter freak.

I know you live in the sunshine state but, he's usually talking about serious stuff, not cracking one-liners.

ArlJim78 · #17 02-06-2009, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Thanks, but I've read enough of Krauthammer's hysteria to know it's not worth any more of my time.

And LOL @ Pants. Like you wouldn't be bitching your little heart out if there were a liberal version of Tim here starting threads with every liberal editorial or blog post they come across. Indepedent my ass.

he's universally very highly regarded and accomplished.
he certainly isn't hysterical, and for you to claim that says to me that you really have not read his work.

read his bio, it's impressive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

miraja2 · #18 02-06-2009, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

he's universally very highly regarded and accomplished.
he certainly isn't hysterical, and for you to claim that says to me that you really have not read his work.

read his bio, it's impressive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

Krauthammer is indeed an intelligent and thoughtful commentator....albeit one with whom I disagree on most foreign policy issues. If the leadership in the Republican Party was a bit more like him (in that they demonstrated actual intelligence and open disdain for the religious right) they would be considerably more tolerable.

Danzig · #19 02-06-2009, 05:35 PM

this country hasn't exactly been doing well for a few years now. i find it fascinating that some are suddenly taking umbrage at the situation, when just a few months ago, all we saw was a defensive posture at the goings' on. oh, but it's a different party now, isn't it?
this is why i don't follow a party-party above country according to some, which i find to be shameful.

at any rate, obama hasn't been in a month yet-give him time to screw things up.
as for congress-they're the predominant problem, and have been for years. far more so in my opinion than the presidential doings (or undoings). domestically, congress has most of the power. match that with a rotten bit of time foreign policy-wise, and here we are.

ArlJim78 · #20 02-06-2009, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2

Krauthammer is indeed an intelligent and thoughtful commentator....albeit one with whom I disagree on most foreign policy issues. If the leadership in the Republican Party was a bit more like him (in that they demonstrated actual intelligence and open disdain for the religious right) they would be considerably more tolerable.

i disagree with him from time to time, but i've learned over 20 years of reading him to pay attention to what he says. Personally I feel he's strongest on foreign policy.

i guess i don't see why having an open disdain for the religious right is the right prescription for the Republicans. all too often it seems that anyone who is open about their faith is somehow demonized. i just don't get why that is.