Aqueduct 1-19

[sdjcom]

minus-$213.30 (2009)

1) $2ex pw 3-5/6-7 $5w 5 lost


3) 2-5/1-3 $5w 5 scr 5 ex 6.90

4) 5-7/4-9 $5w 7 scr 7 lost


5) 2-10/3-4 $5w 10 lost

6) 1-11/6-7 $5w 1 lost

7) 5-10/3-4 $5w 5 lost

8) 3-4/6-8 $5w 4 scr 3 lost


total bet $91 total bet after scr's $ 64 won 6.90 -57.10 for day minus -$271 (2009)

[TheSpyder]

Good luck, although I really don't understand you bets. Are those exacta?

[sdjcom]

Thx yes the top line shows ex part-wheel 3-5 to win 6-7 for second 4 bets $8 total on exactas

[sdjcom]

i'm in Dallas waiting on a load so put them in pre-scratches, because could leave any time over the road, was waiting to post under Steve's picks but he's late this a.m. if he's posting Aqueduct. Give him some coffee!!!

[TheSpyder]

So in this case you're betting 3 or 5 to win and 6 or 7 to come in second. So in other words, you're not giving 3 or 5 a chance for second? Correct? This seems a bit odd but what to I know.

Originally Posted by sdjcom

Thx yes the top line shows ex part-wheel 3-5 to win 6-7 for second 4 bets $8 total on exactas

[sdjcom]

correct, im down and in a little losing streak so i'm cutting down on costs till i have a good day and cut the losses down, then i'll play the exactas like this
3-5 with 3-5-6-7

[dellinger63]

why not box your top 2 for extra $? I can understand using a horse only 2nd but can't see how you reason taking 2 for top position and 2 others for 2nd. Perfect example IMO is the 6 in the 2nd race at Aqu. If you watch his past races he is a hanger in that he has no problem being 2nd but refuses to lead. He was hanging behind the front runner down the stretch and as soon as a closer got past he hung behind that one. That 1 I can see using only for a minor spot but liking 2 horses to win and playing ex's w/o using your A horses for 2nd makes no sense IMO. GL today nonetheless but don't try to shake a losing streak by throwing darts.