A question about our user name ratings?

Stickhorse · #1 12-14-2008, 09:58 AM

I scanned the FAQ and could not find a hierarchy list for the ratings that each of us gets below our user names on our post.

Can somebody give me a hand?

cowgirlintexas · #2 12-14-2008, 10:01 AM

What are you talking about?

Hickory Hill Hoff · #3 12-14-2008, 10:14 AM

Underneath your "handle" or "screen name" is a racetrack name listed, changes with the amount of postings you make.

cowgirlintexas · #4 12-14-2008, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff

Underneath your "handle" or "screen name" is a racetrack name listed, changes with the amount of postings you make.

Really? I did not know that..............What is the meaning of that? I just always thought it changed randomly. Hmmmm. Interesting.. I guess.

Stickhorse · #5 12-14-2008, 10:20 AM

Yes, the race track rating that corresponds with the amount of activty.

Is there a page where there is a hierarchy that list how many postings you need to have in order to get to the various race track ratings?

Stickhorse · #6 12-14-2008, 10:23 AM

Just from my own personal history that I've noted I have been:
Foal
Yearling
Sam Houston
Les Bois

cowgirlintexas · #7 12-14-2008, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickhorse

Yes, the race track rating that corresponds with the amount of activty.

Is there a page where there is a hierarchy that list how many postings you need to have in order to get to the various race track ratings?

Does it matter? I mean really?

paisjpq · #8 12-14-2008, 10:37 AM

the user rating change with the number of posts made...the track names increase in "prominence" (sort-of) the higher one goes. They are only visible internally, there isn't a listing on the page.

#9 12-14-2008, 11:03 AM

Hey Thebby could you change mine to Riverside Downs (AHHHHH!!! FIRE!)

?

Mortimer · #10 12-14-2008, 01:33 PM

The designation "TopPredator" is earned by attaining "X" number of irrational posts.

AeWingnut · #11 12-14-2008, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortimer

The designation "TopPredator" is earned by attaining "X" number of irrational posts.

Since its birth as the dual resonance model which described the strongly interacting hadrons as strings, the term string theory has changed to include any of a group of related superstring theories which unite them. One shared property of all these theories is the holographic principle. String theory itself consists of many theories with different mathematical formulas. The logical coherence of the approach, however, and the fact that string theory can include all older theories of physics, have led many physicists to believe that such a connection is possible. In particular, string theory is the first candidate for the theory of everything, a way to describe all the known natural forces (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak and strong) and matter (quarks and leptons) in a mathematically complete system. On the other hand, many detractors criticise string theory because it has not yet provided experimentally testable predictions.

Like any other quantum theory of gravity, it is widely believed that testing the theory experimentally would be prohibitively expensive, requiring feats of engineering on a solar-system scale. Although some critics concede that string theory is falsifiable in principle, they maintain that it is unfalsifiable for the foreseeable future, and so should not be called science.

String theory is of interest to many physicists because of the mathematics involved, and because of the large number of forms that the theories can take. String theory strongly suggests that spacetime has eleven dimensions,[1] as opposed to the usual three space and one time, but the theory can easily describe universes with four observable spacetime dimensions as well.[2]

String theories include objects more general than strings, called branes. The word brane, derived from "membrane", refers to a variety of interrelated objects, such as D-branes, black p-branes and Neveu-Schwarz 5-branes. These are typically extended objects that source differential form generalizations of the vector potential electromagnetic field. All such objects are known to be related to one-another by a variety of dualities. For example, the black hole-like black p-branes are identified with D-branes, upon which strings end, through Gauge-gravity duality. Research on this equivalence has led to new insights on quantum chromodynamics, the fundamental theory of the strong nuclear force.[3

geeker2 · #12 12-14-2008, 01:59 PM

^^^^Silent Member of TAPS

Mortimer · #13 12-14-2008, 02:58 PM

the user rating change with the number of posts made...the track names increase in "prominence" (sort-of) the higher one goes. They are only visible internally, there isn't a listing on the page.

Obvious subtle backhand.