Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2010, 10:29 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default Westboro Baptist

Amazing how many people think they should not be allowed to protest. They observed the 1000 feet rule at the funeral. Are they jerks? Of course. But if they want to hold up God Hates Fags signs etc, they are protected just as the '78 Skokie case showed and the 1988 case of Larry Flynt. If you don't like it, you have a choice. Ignore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0meqcKTAcMU
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:28 PM
hockey2315 hockey2315 is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Amazing how many people think they should not be allowed to protest. They observed the 1000 feet rule at the funeral. Are they jerks? Of course. But if they want to hold up God Hates Fags signs etc, they are protected just as the '78 Skokie case showed and the 1988 case of Larry Flynt. If you don't like it, you have a choice. Ignore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0meqcKTAcMU
Bit of an understatement.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:30 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey2315 View Post
Bit of an understatement.
So? Bad people exist. And hate speech is protected. Wanting otherwise shows a lack of recognition on what the first amendment guarantees.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:35 PM
hockey2315 hockey2315 is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,403
Default

Did I say their free speech shouldn't be protected? It really shouldn't be, but it has to be. No way around it even though the court is dying to find a loophole.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:42 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey2315 View Post
Did I say their free speech shouldn't be protected? It really shouldn't be, but it has to be. No way around it even though the court is dying to find a loophole.
There will be no loophole and it should be protected...They will win the case. It never should've gone to trial to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-2010, 12:44 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
There will be no loophole and it should be protected...They will win the case. It never should've gone to trial to begin with.
yup
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.