Thursday Play Along

[Pants II]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Wasn't the 2 off a 20 point beyer decline then another race where his beyer dropped and he did not a step again worth betting against? Pretty big drop from the 85k 1x to this 25k claimer. I lost, but I didn't love the 2.

Look you can hindsight all you'd like but that race was lost strictly on a premature urging at the start of the race.

There was no need for that horse to be urged to the lead. There was no real speed in the race. Doesn't matter how the horse drops off in an allowance race. That's a whole different monster.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Pants II

Look you can hindsight all you'd like but that race was lost strictly on a premature urging at the start of the race.

There was no need for that horse to be urged to the lead. There was no real speed in the race. Doesn't matter how the horse drops off in an allowance race. That's a whole different monster.

Im not arguing that the rider sucks. I dislike Robby and that was just another reason to be against.

[ScottJ]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Im not arguing that the rider sucks. I dislike Robby and that was just another reason to be against.

The entire contingent coming in Churchill has been terrible all meeting : Albarado and Lanerie have led the list.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by ScottJ

The entire contingent coming in Churchill has been terrible all meeting : Albarado and Lanerie have led the list.

I agree thats why I didn't use either of the exacta horses in race 2. If I did I would be live to a decent pick 3 right now.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Pants II

Look you can hindsight all you'd like but that race was lost strictly on a premature urging at the start of the race.

There was no need for that horse to be urged to the lead. There was no real speed in the race. Doesn't matter how the horse drops off in an allowance race. That's a whole different monster.

Why bother even trying to explain to him what happened there while he is trying to take credit for using two horses that zero chance of finishing ahead of the 2 in the race, regardless of how bad the 2 could be ridden? He is trolling as usual and deserves to be ignored, there is nothing to be gained discussing anything with him.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by pointman

Why bother even trying to explain to him what happened there while he is trying to take credit for using two horses that zero chance of finishing ahead of the 2 in the race, regardless of how bad the 2 could be ridden? He is trolling as usual and deserves to be ignored, there is nothing to be gained discussing anything with him.

You need to block me if you have a problem. You don't run anything. Im not trolling. I didn't like the 2 at all. I also lost. This place is to discuss racing not only you pump in your losing multis and the occasional $20 win bet. If you blocked me there would never be an issue. Its funny the last 3x we have had contact have been you taking a shot at me.
The horse was taking a huge drop, there was other speed, had declining beyers and a shitty jockey. And was overbet. Show me where anything I said was me trolling. You dont like me and you keep doing this whenever I say something that you dont like. Block me and it will be over. Me blocking you wont do anything, since I dont start anything with you....