Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
This whole case is absurd. You have a 6'4, 295 pound guy that commits a strong-arm robbery at a store. Then the police have a confrontation with him a few blocks away on an unrelated issue. They tell him to put his hands in the air. He refuses and they draw their guns. Then he charges towards them and they shoot him. So what's the big controversy?
As usual, all the early reports we got from the press were wrong. They claimed he was shot in the back and that turned out to be totally false. They claim he was fleeing. That turned out to be totally false. The protesters would never admit that they were wrong. They want to still believe their made-up version of the events, that a harmless, innocent black guy was shot in the back by the police. Why don't they just admit that they had the facts wrong and go home.
|
"They"? Where are you getting your facts from, Rupert? There was no "they."