Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2014, 10:56 AM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointman View Post
I fail to see the negative here.
I think the change is appropriate. I always thought the limit was pretty silly. The old limits based upon course configuration (8 horse limit at 5F, 10 at 5.5F, 12 at 6F and 14 at 7F) seemed to work just fine. I just found it ironic that those who initially championed the limit in field size wanted it changed when, in a few instances, it did not work to their benefit.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2014, 12:08 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms View Post
I think the change is appropriate. I always thought the limit was pretty silly. The old limits based upon course configuration (8 horse limit at 5F, 10 at 5.5F, 12 at 6F and 14 at 7F) seemed to work just fine. I just found it ironic that those who initially championed the limit in field size wanted it changed when, in a few instances, it did not work to their benefit.
Could you please find the links that show Todd championing the limit...or others that you now know are against it?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2014, 12:12 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Why would Cordero be for limiting the field size? I really find that very hard to believe.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2014, 01:05 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Could you please find the links that show Todd championing the limit...or others that you now know are against it?
All that matters is that Martin Panza is apparently now against the universal 8-horse limit, or else it would not have been changed. It is the latest of many good changes that he has made since becoming head of NYRA's racing department.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2014, 05:54 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms View Post
All that matters is that Martin Panza is apparently now against the universal 8-horse limit, or else it would not have been changed. It is the latest of many good changes that he has made since becoming head of NYRA's racing department.
That's fine, whether true or not, but you made an accusatory remark, and I think it's only fair that you back it up.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.