palin proves you can't fix stupid

[joeydb]

If it's hard to do a worse job than Obama, the converse is that it's easier for most people to do a better job.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by joeydb

If it's hard to do a worse job than Obama, the converse is that it's easier for most people to do a better job.

that would be incorrect. your logic is flawed.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Danzig

that would be incorrect. your logic is flawed.

Based upon his comments it is either a traumatic brain injury or trolling. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say the later.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Based upon his comments it is either a traumatic brain injury or trolling. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say the later.

lol

joey, you're assuming it can't be worse. of course it can. also, just because you have a difference of opinion with the president, doesn't mean he's bad.
and i don't think you really consider everything that has happened, and are judging every occurrence on its merits.
i think you view people as good or bad based only on whether they have a 'd' or 'r' next to their name.
since many obama policies are continuances of bush policies, i'm not sure how someone can say bush did ok, but obama is bad. the only change in the last 5 years is the aca coming into being.
i know people don't like to be told this, but the individual mandate was a repub idea, and it was included in the bill-but because dems were putting it together, suddenly repubs rejected their own idea, that they had originially supported! that is a fact, not an opinion. one fact that repubs wish people would forget.

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Danzig

that would be incorrect. your logic is flawed.

Care to explain why it's flawed? This guy will go down as one of the worst presidents ever, far surpassing in negative magnitude Bush 43.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by joeydb

Care to explain why it's flawed? This guy will go down as one of the worst presidents ever, far surpassing in negative magnitude Bush 43.

yes. you have no idea how bad it could be. you're assuming it's as bad as it could be, that no one could do worse, and that anyone else would be an improvement. it can always be worse. however, i can't prove a negative, and hopefully we'll never find out how well or badly palin could do.
also, history dictates whether someone turns out bad or not. your opinion isn't shared by everyone, so there's no way of knowing if he's going to be judged so harshly.

you're also completely ignoring the fact that the president isn't the only person in charge of our government. you're placing no blame elsewhere.